Anomaly detection in gravitational waves data using convolutional autoencoders

As of this moment, fifty gravitational waves (GW) detections have been announced, thanks to the observational efforts of the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration, working with the Advanced LIGO and the Advanced Virgo interferometers. The detection of signals is complicated by the noise-dominated nature of the data. Conventional approaches in GW detection procedures require either precise knowledge of the GW waveform in the context of matched filtering searches or coincident analysis of data from multiple detectors. Furthermore, the analysis is prone to contamination by instrumental or environmental artifacts called glitches which either mimic astrophysical signals or reduce the overall quality of data. In this paper, we propose an alternative generic method of studying GW data based on detecting anomalies. The anomalies we study are transient signals, different from the slow non-stationary noise of the detector. Presented in the manuscript anomalies are mostly based on the GW emitted by the mergers of binary black hole systems. However, the presented study of anomalies is not limited only to GW alone, but also includes glitches occurring in the real LIGO/Virgo dataset available at the Gravitational Waves Open Science Center.

[1]  E. Katsavounidis,et al.  Multiresolution techniques for the detection of gravitational-wave bursts , 2004, gr-qc/0412119.

[2]  D. Shih,et al.  Searching for new physics with deep autoencoders , 2018, Physical Review D.

[3]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , 2018 .

[4]  C. Messenger,et al.  Deep-learning continuous gravitational waves , 2019, Physical Review D.

[5]  Robert J. Taylor,et al.  Erratum: Searches for Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars at Two Harmonics in 2015-2017 LIGO Data (Astrophysical Journal (2019) 879 (10) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/Ab20cb) , 2019 .

[6]  M. Loupias,et al.  The Virgo status , 2006 .

[7]  G. Mitselmakher,et al.  Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors , 2015, 1511.05999.

[8]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[9]  J. K. Blackburn,et al.  GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run , 2020, 2010.14527.

[10]  Y. Wang,et al.  GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO. , 2016, Physical review. D..

[11]  Lucianne Walkowicz,et al.  Systematic serendipity: a test of unsupervised machine learning as a method for anomaly detection , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[12]  Kumar,et al.  Experimental test of the quantum shot noise reduction theory. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[13]  Kevin Skadron,et al.  Scalable parallel programming , 2008, 2008 IEEE Hot Chips 20 Symposium (HCS).

[14]  M. Brescia,et al.  Anomaly Detection in Astrophysics: A Comparison Between Unsupervised Deep and Machine Learning on KiDS Data , 2020, Intelligent Astrophysics.

[15]  Daniel George,et al.  Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation with Advanced LIGO Data , 2017, ArXiv.

[16]  G. Calamai,et al.  On line power spectra identification and whitening for the noise in interferometric gravitational wave detectors , 2000, gr-qc/0011041.

[17]  Daniel George,et al.  Denoising Gravitational Waves with Enhanced Deep Recurrent Denoising Auto-encoders , 2017, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  Arthur L. Samuel,et al.  Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers , 1967, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[19]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run , 2014, 1410.7764.

[20]  Elena Cuoco,et al.  Core-Collapse supernova gravitational-wave search and deep learning classification , 2020, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..

[21]  G. Mitselmakher,et al.  A coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts , 2004 .

[22]  Von Welch,et al.  Reproducing GW150914: The First Observation of Gravitational Waves From a Binary Black Hole Merger , 2016, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[23]  Michał Bejger,et al.  Convolutional neural network classifier for the output of the time-domain F-statistic all-sky search for continuous gravitational waves. , 2019 .

[24]  B. Owen,et al.  Matched filtering of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Computational cost and template placement , 1998, gr-qc/9808076.

[25]  E. Salpeter The Luminosity function and stellar evolution , 1955 .

[26]  Michelangelo Ceci,et al.  Scalable auto-encoders for gravitational waves detection from time series data , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Autoencoders, Unsupervised Learning, and Deep Architectures , 2011, ICML Unsupervised and Transfer Learning.

[28]  Elena Cuoco,et al.  Image-based deep learning for classification of noise transients in gravitational wave detectors , 2018, ArXiv.

[29]  Frank Ohme,et al.  Twist and shout: A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms , 2013, 1308.3271.

[30]  Adam A. Miller,et al.  Erratum: “First Search for Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars with Advanced LIGO” (2017, ApJ, 839, 12) , 2017 .

[31]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[32]  Maria Alessandra Papa,et al.  Deep learning for clustering of continuous gravitational wave candidates II: identification of low-SNR candidates , 2020, ArXiv.

[33]  Matthew West,et al.  The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence , 2015, 1508.02357.