Modelling soil carbon development in Swedish coniferous forest soils—An uncertainty analysis of parameters and model estimates using the GLUE method

Abstract Boreal forest soils such as those in Sweden contain a large active carbon stock. Hence, a relatively small change in this stock can have a major impact on the Swedish national CO2 balance. Understanding of the uncertainties in the estimations of soil carbon pools is critical for accurately assessing changes in carbon stocks in the national reports to UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol. Our objective was to analyse the parameter uncertainties of simulated estimates of the soil organic carbon (SOC) development between 1994 and 2002 in Swedish coniferous forests with the Q model. Both the sensitivity of model parameters and the uncertainties in simulations were assessed. Data of forests with Norway spruce, Scots pine and Lodgepole pine, from the Swedish Forest Soil Inventory (SFSI) were used. Data of 12 Swedish counties were used to calibrate parameter settings; and data from another 11 counties to validate. The “limits of acceptability” within GLUE were set at the 95% confidence interval for the annual, mean measured SOC at county scale. The calibration procedure reduced the parameter uncertainties and reshaped the distributions of the parameters county-specific. The average measured and simulated SOC amounts varied from 60 t C ha−1 in northern to 140 t C ha−1 in the southern Sweden. The calibrated model simulated the soil carbon pool within the limits of acceptability for all calibration counties except for one county during one year. The efficiency of the calibrated model varied strongly; for five out of 12 counties the model estimates agreed well with measurements, for two counties agreement was moderate and for five counties the agreement was poor. The lack of agreement can be explained with the high inter-annual variability of the down-scaled measured SOC estimates and changes in forest areas over time. We conclude that, although we succeed in reducing the uncertainty in the model estimates, calibrating of a regional scale process-oriented model using a national scale dataset is a sensitive balance between introducing and reducing uncertainties. Parameter distributions showed to be scale sensitive and county specific. Further analysis of uncertainties in the methods used for reporting SOC changes to the UNFCCC and Kyoto protocol is recommended.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality and the problem of robust calibration in nitrogen budget simulations , 1999 .

[2]  J. Stendahl,et al.  Organic carbon stocks in Swedish Podzol soils in relation to soil hydrology and other site characteristics. , 2009 .

[3]  G. Ågren,et al.  Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model , 2003 .

[4]  F. Allison,et al.  MAINTENANCE OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER: I. INORGANIC SOIL COLLOID AS A FACTOR IN RETENTION OF CARBON DURING FORMATION OF HUMUS , 1949 .

[5]  Per-Olof Johansson,et al.  Temporal sampling strategies and uncertainty in calibrating a conceptual hydrological model for a small boreal catchment , 2009 .

[6]  Keith Beven,et al.  Informal likelihood measures in model assessment: Theoretic development and investigation , 2008 .

[7]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Predicting long-term soil carbon storage from short-term information , 1998 .

[8]  G. Ågren,et al.  Quality : a bridge between theory and experiment in soil organic matter studies , 1996 .

[9]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[11]  Andrea Hublin,et al.  NATIONAL INVENTORY REPORT 2007 , 2007 .

[12]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[13]  K. Beven,et al.  Testing a new model of aphid abundance with sedentary and non-sedentary predators , 2009 .

[14]  G. Ågren,et al.  Pine Forest Floor Carbon Accumulation in Response to N and PK Additions: Bomb 14C Modelling and Respiration Studies , 2003, Ecosystems.

[15]  R. Kasteel,et al.  An Improved Dual‐Permeability Model of Water Flow and Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone , 2005 .

[16]  A. Lindroth,et al.  Pools and fluxes of carbon in three Norway spruce ecosystems along a climatic gradient in Sweden , 2008 .

[17]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[18]  R. Lal.  Forest soils and carbon sequestration , 2005 .

[19]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Are Swedish forest soils sinks or sources for CO2—model analyses based on forest inventory data , 2007 .

[20]  P. Heuberger,et al.  Calibration of process-oriented models , 1995 .

[21]  Thomas Kätterer,et al.  Uncertainty analyses for calibrating a soil carbon balance model to agricultural field trial data in Sweden and Kenya , 2010 .

[22]  J. Heikkinen,et al.  Tree influence on carbon stock and C:N ratio of soil organic layer in boreal Scots pine forests. , 2010 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty) , 1999 .

[24]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[25]  Swedish Environmental.  Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol , 2010 .

[26]  Johan Stendahl,et al.  The stone and boulder content of Swedish forest soils , 2009 .

[27]  J. Liski,et al.  Changes in soil carbon with stand age – an evaluation of a modelling method with empirical data , 2004 .

[28]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Decomposer invasion rate, decomposer growth rate, and substrate chemical quality: how they influence soil organic matter turnover , 2001 .

[29]  Keith Beven,et al.  Multiple sources of predictive uncertainty in modeled estimates of net ecosystem CO2 exchange , 2009 .

[30]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales , 2009 .

[31]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  FOREST CARBON SINKS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE , 2002 .

[32]  J. Stendahl,et al.  Soil organic carbon in Swedish spruce and pine forests – differences in stock levels and regional patterns , 2010 .

[33]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[34]  Per-Erik Jansson,et al.  Modelling soil C sequestration in spruce forest ecosystems along a Swedish transect based on current conditions , 2008 .

[35]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Theoretical ecosystem ecology : understanding element cycles , 1996 .

[36]  Edward J. Rykiel,et al.  Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation , 1996 .

[37]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate , 1992 .

[38]  K. Beven,et al.  A hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. , 2002 .

[39]  Oleg Chertov,et al.  Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils , 2007 .

[40]  T. Palosuo,et al.  Factors affecting the uncertainty of sinks and stocks of carbon in Finnish forests soils and vegetation , 2006 .

[41]  Raisa Mäkipää,et al.  Relationship between biomass and percentage cover in understorey vegetation of boreal coniferous forests , 2006 .

[42]  G. Ågren,et al.  Theoretical analyses of carbon and nutrient dynamics in soil profiles , 1996 .

[43]  J. Hassink,et al.  Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils , 1992, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[44]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Predicting effects of different harvesting intensities with a model of nitrogen limited forest growth , 1999 .

[45]  B. Stewart,et al.  Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon , 2000 .

[46]  Leif T. Jensen,et al.  A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments , 1997 .

[47]  Aleksi Lehtonen,et al.  Carbon accumulation in Finland's forests 1922–2004 – an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modelling of biomass, litter and soil , 2006 .