Morphometry of Macaca mulatta forelimb. II. Fiber‐type composition in shoulder and elbow muscles

The present study examined the fiber‐type proportions of 22 muscles spanning the shoulder and/or elbow joints of three Macaca mulatta. Fibers were classified as one of three types: fast‐glycolytic (FG), fast‐oxidative‐glycolytic (FOG), or slow‐oxidative (SO). In most muscles, the FG fibers predominated, but proportions ranged from 25–67% in different muscles. SO fibers were less abundant except in a few deep, small muscles where they comprised as much as 56% of the fibers. Cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the three fiber types was measured in six different muscles. FG fibers tended to be the largest, whereas SO fibers were the smallest. While fiber‐type size was not always consistent between muscles, the relative size of FG fibers was generally larger than FOG and SO fibers within the same muscle. When fiber CSA was taken into consideration, FG fibers were found to comprise over 50% of the muscle's CSA in almost all muscles. J. Morphol. 251:323–332, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Muscle architecture and force-velocity characteristics of cat soleus and medial gastrocnemius: implications for motor control. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Bárány,et al.  ATPase Activity of Myosin Correlated with Speed of Muscle Shortening , 1967, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  E. J. Cheng,et al.  Morphometry of Macaca mulatta forelimb. I. Shoulder and elbow muscles and segment inertial parameters , 2000, Journal of morphology.

[4]  R. Burke Motor Units: Anatomy, Physiology, and Functional Organization , 1981 .

[5]  V. Edgerton,et al.  HINDLIMB MUSCLE FIBER POPULATIONS OF FIVE MAMMALS , 1973 .

[6]  A. Georgopoulos Current issues in directional motor control , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  L. Stevens,et al.  Structure-function relationship of soleus muscle fibres from the rhesus monkey , 1995, Pflügers Archiv.

[8]  P. Powell,et al.  Architectural design and fiber-type distribution of the major elbow flexors and extensors of the monkey (cynomolgus). , 1984, The American journal of anatomy.

[9]  F. Richmond,et al.  Marked non-uniformity of fiber-type composition in the primate suboccipital muscle obliquus capitis inferior , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  S. Scott,et al.  Cortical control of reaching movements , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  G. Loeb,et al.  Mechanics of feline soleus: I. Effect of fascicle length and velocity on force output , 1996, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility.

[12]  R. Enoka,et al.  Kinematic assessment of a functional role for recurrent inhibition and selective recruitment , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  B D Corneil,et al.  Neck muscles in the rhesus monkey. I. Muscle morphometry and histochemistry. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Loeb,et al.  Feline caudofemoralis muscle Muscle fibre properties, architecture, and motor innervation , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  R. Roy,et al.  Fiber‐type composition of selected hindlimb muscles of a primate (cynomolgus monkey) , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[16]  J. Steiss,et al.  Histochemical and morphometric study of fiber types in ten skeletal muscles of healthy young adult cats. , 1995, American journal of veterinary research.

[17]  L. Guth,et al.  Procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase. , 1970, Experimental neurology.

[18]  E. Schmidt,et al.  Fiber type composition of monkey forearm muscle , 1985, The Anatomical record.

[19]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Architectural and fiber type distribution properties of selected rhesus leg muscles: feasibility of multiple independent biopsies. , 1991, Acta anatomica.

[20]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[21]  Ian E. Brown,et al.  Virtual muscle: a computational approach to understanding the effects of muscle properties on motor control , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.