Generating daily activity schedules for households using Genetic Algorithms

One way of making activity-based travel analysis operational for transport planning is multiagent micro-simulation. Modeling activity and trip generation based on individual and social characteristics are central steps in this method. The model presented here generates complete daily activity schedules based on the structure of a household and its members’ activity agendas. The model assumes that the household is another basic decision-making unit for travel demand aside from individual mobility needs. Results of the model are schedules containing complete information about activity type and sequence, locations, and means of transportation, as well as activity start times and durations. The generated schedules are the outcome of a probabilistic optimisation using genetic algorithms. This iterative method improves solutions found in a random search according to the specification of a fitness criterion, which equals utility here. It contains behavioural assumptions about individuals as well as the household level. Individual utility is derived from the number of activities and their respective durations. It is reduced by costs of travelling, waiting times, and environmental as well as social constraints. The household level is represented directly by the utility of joint activities, and indirectly by allocation of activities and means of transportation to household members. The paper presents initial tests with a three-person household, detailing resulting schedules, and discussing run time experiences. A sensitivity analysis of the joint utility parameter impact is also included.

[1]  Kai Nagel,et al.  An Improved Framework for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Sim- ulations of Travel Behavior , 2004 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The design of environmentally aware travel diaries , 1996 .

[3]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  VALUATION OF USERS' BENEFITS IN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS , 1988 .

[4]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Complex Activity Travel Patterns: Comparison of Euclidean Distance, Signal-Processing Theoretical, and Multidimensional Sequence Alignment Methods , 2001 .

[5]  Wilfred W. Recker,et al.  The Household Activity Pattern Problem: General Formulation and Solution , 1995 .

[6]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  A simultaneous simulation of activity chains , 1990 .

[7]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Judging the day: A synthesis of the literature on measuring the utility of activity patterns , 1990 .

[8]  J. Bates,et al.  THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING RESEARCH PROGRAMME. 4. THE TRANSPORT MODELS , 1996 .

[9]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Intershopping duration: An analysis using multiweek data , 2002 .

[10]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 2004 .

[11]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Strategies for Resolving Activity Scheduling Conflicts: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[12]  T Garling,et al.  HOUSEHOLD ACTIVITY SCHEDULING , 1989 .

[13]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life , 2000 .

[14]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Travel-time uncertainty, departure time choice, and the cost of morning commutes , 1995 .

[15]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Computer Simulation of Household Activity Scheduling , 1998 .

[16]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Computational-Process Modelling of Household Activity Scheduling , 1993 .

[17]  E. Miller,et al.  A computerized household activity scheduling survey , 2000 .

[18]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  EUROTOPP - Towards a dynamic and activity-based modelling framework , 1991 .

[19]  P. Jones,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour , 1983 .

[20]  C H Chang-Hyeon Joh,et al.  Measuring and predicting adaptation in multidimensional activity-travel patterns , 2004 .

[21]  R. Kitamura APPLICATIONS OF MODELS OF ACTIVITY BEHAVIOR FOR ACTIVITY BASED DEMAND FORECASTING , 1997 .

[22]  Pranay Singhi,et al.  Analysis of joint trips using C++ in mobidrive , 2001 .

[23]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  A unified framework for the development of a weekly household activity-travel scheduling model , 1998 .

[24]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[25]  P. Bovy,et al.  ROUTE CHOICE: WAYFINDING IN TRANSPORT NETWORKS , 1990 .

[26]  K. Nagel,et al.  Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[27]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[28]  E I Pas,et al.  TIME USE RESEARCH AND TRAVEL DEMAND ANALYSIS AND MODELLING , 1997 .

[29]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  INTERSHOPPING DURATION: AN ANALYSIS USING MULTIWEEK DATA , 2002 .

[30]  Konrad Meister,et al.  Erzeugung kompletter Aktivitätenpläne für Haushalte mit genetischen Algorithmen , 2004 .

[31]  John L. Bowman,et al.  The Day Activity Schedule Approach to Travel Demand Analysis , 1998 .

[32]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Methodology for modeling household time allocation behavior , 2004 .

[33]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[34]  Dick Ettema,et al.  A SIMULATION MODEL OF ACTIVITY SCHEDULING BEHAVIOUR , 1992 .

[35]  P. Jones,et al.  ‘HATS’: A Technique for Investigating Household Decisions , 1979 .

[36]  A. Deserpa A Theory of the Economics of Time , 1971 .