The rotational barrier of ethane and some of its hexasubstituted derivatives in terms of the forces acting on the electron distribution.

A novel and alternative explanation of the rotational barrier of ethane and several hexasubstituted derivatives, CX3CX3 (X = H, F, CH3, Cl, Br), is suggested based on the evaluation of the properties of the electron distribution. The forces exerted on the electron density of the topological atoms making up a molecule, the Ehrenfest forces, are analyzed and, with the help of the virial theorem, they are used to explain the experimental rotational barriers. According to this approach, the barrier is mainly a consequence of the decrease of the always attractive Ehrenfest forces (EFs) linking the two C atoms. In addition, the behavior of the EFs is related to a decrease of stability of the central C atoms, which is not compensated by the stabilization of the substituents. Also, during rotation from the staggered to the equilibrium conformation, the electron density at the C-C bond critical point and the electron delocalization between C atoms decrease and are accompanied by an increase of electron delocalization between the substituents. According to the analysis of the EF field lines and to the behavior of the integrated forces, the rotational barrier cannot be explained as a result of any repulsive forces acting on the electron density, although a possible interpretation of the quantum force that balances the EF in stationary states as a measure of traditional Pauli repulsions is also examined.

[1]  Gabriel Cuevas,et al.  Assessment of hydrophobic interactions and their contributions through the analysis of the methane dimer , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  K. Finzel How does the ambiguity of the electronic stress tensor influence its ability to serve as bonding indicator , 2014 .

[3]  James S. M. Anderson,et al.  The Ehrenfest force topology: a physically intuitive approach for analyzing chemical interactions. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[4]  Mikael P. Johansson,et al.  Intramolecular halogen-halogen bonds? , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[5]  J. Hernández‐Trujillo,et al.  The Ehrenfest force field: Topology and consequences for the definition of an atom in a molecule. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  F. Cortés‐Guzmán,et al.  Application of the additivity of group energies to understand conformational preference: the anomeric effect. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[7]  Kelling J. Donald,et al.  Shorter still: compressing C-C single bonds. , 2010, Organic letters.

[8]  James S. M. Anderson,et al.  How ambiguous is the local kinetic energy? , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[9]  A. Tachibana,et al.  Electronic stress tensor of the hydrogen molecular ion: Comparison between the exact wave function and approximate wave functions using Gaussian basis sets , 2010, 1006.1264.

[10]  P. Salvador,et al.  Dissecting the hindered rotation of ethane. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[11]  G. Kaupp Mechanochemistry: the varied applications of mechanical bond-breaking , 2009 .

[12]  Evelio Francisco,et al.  Steric repulsions, rotation barriers, and stereoelectronic effects: A real space perspective , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  N. Govind,et al.  Toward understanding the nature of internal rotation barriers with a new energy partition scheme: ethane and n-butane. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[14]  R. López,et al.  Chemical forces in terms of the electron density , 2007 .

[15]  J. Murray,et al.  Reaction force decomposition of activation barriers to elucidate solvent effects. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[16]  Jiali Gao,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the rotational barrier of ethane. , 2007, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  E. Francisco,et al.  Interacting Quantum Atoms:  A Correlated Energy Decomposition Scheme Based on the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  R. Bader,et al.  Properties of Atoms in Molecules:  Caged Atoms and the Ehrenfest Force. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  Jiali Gao,et al.  The magnitude of hyperconjugation in ethane: a perspective from ab initio valence bond theory. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  R. López,et al.  Density and binding forces: Rotational barrier of ethane , 2003 .

[21]  E. Baerends,et al.  The case for steric repulsion causing the staggered conformation of ethane. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  F. Weinhold Rebuttal to the Bickelhaupt–Baerends Case for Steric Repulsion Causing the Staggered Conformation of Ethane , 2003 .

[23]  Frank Weinhold Prof. Rebuttal to the Bickelhaupt–Baerends Case for Steric Repulsion Causing the Staggered Conformation of Ethane† , 2003 .

[24]  Chérif F. Matta,et al.  Proton Spin−Spin Coupling and Electron Delocalization , 2002 .

[25]  Á. M. Pendás,et al.  Stress, virial, and pressure in the theory of atoms in molecules , 2002 .

[26]  C. Frisbie,et al.  Contact mechanics modeling of pull-off measurements: effect of solvent, probe radius, and chemical binding probability on the detection of single-bond rupture forces by atomic force microscopy. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  Lionel Goodman,et al.  Hyperconjugation not steric repulsion leads to the staggered structure of ethane , 2001, Nature.

[28]  H. Güntherodt,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Short-Range Chemical Bonding Forces , 2001, Science.

[29]  R. Bader,et al.  Properties of Atoms in Molecules: Atoms Forming Molecules , 2000 .

[30]  Á. M. Pendás,et al.  Non-nuclear Maxima of the Electron Density , 1999 .

[31]  A. Streitwieser,et al.  An ab initio study of electrophilic aromatic substitution , 1999 .

[32]  M. Rief,et al.  How strong is a covalent bond? , 1999, Science.

[33]  L. Goodman,et al.  Flexing analysis of ethane internal rotation energetics , 1999 .

[34]  L. Goodman,et al.  Flexing analysis of steric exchange repulsion accompanying ethane internal rotation , 1998 .

[35]  a Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Carbon−Carbon Rotational Barriers in Butane, 1-Butene, and 1,3-Butadiene , 1996 .

[36]  Andrew Streitwieser,et al.  Electron Delocalization and the Fermi Hole , 1996 .

[37]  Kenneth B. Wiberg,et al.  Origin of rotation and inversion barriers , 1990 .

[38]  M. Bremer,et al.  Very Short CC Single Bonds and Their Origin. The Central Bond Length in Bitetrahedryl , 1989 .

[39]  Martin,et al.  Quantum-mechanical theory of stress and force. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[40]  Russell M. Pitzer,et al.  The barrier to internal rotation in ethane , 1983 .

[41]  S. Saito,et al.  Barrier to internal rotation in ethane from the microwave spectrum of CH3CHD2 , 1979 .

[42]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[43]  J. Anderson,et al.  Secondary effect on barriers to rotation in substituted ethanes , 1975 .

[44]  E. Hirota,et al.  Molecular Structure and Internal Rotation of Hexachloroethane, Hexachlorodisilane, and Trichloromethyl‐Trichlorosilane , 1958 .

[45]  R. Feynman Forces in Molecules , 1939 .

[46]  J. D. Kemp,et al.  The Entropy of Ethane and the Third Law of Thermodynamics. Hindered Rotation of Methyl Groups , 1937 .

[47]  J. D. Kemp,et al.  Hindered Rotation of the Methyl Groups in Ethane , 1936 .

[48]  P. Ehrenfest Bemerkung über die angenäherte Gültigkeit der klassischen Mechanik innerhalb der Quantenmechanik , 1927 .

[49]  R. Bader,et al.  Forces in molecules. , 2007, Faraday discussions.

[50]  Xavier Fradera,et al.  The Lewis Model and Beyond , 1999 .

[51]  R. Bader Atoms in molecules : a quantum theory , 1990 .

[52]  E. L. Pace The Force Constants for CF4 and C2F6 , 1948 .