Computerization of a Preanesthetic Evaluation and User satisfaction evaluation

Preanesthetic evaluation purpose is to reduce morbidity and mortality through the review of the patient's medical history, clinical examination, and targeted clinical studies, providing referrals for medical consultations when appropriated. Changes in patient care, standards of health information management and patterns of perioperative care, have resulted in a re-conceptualization of this process where the documentation of patient medical information, the efforts in training and maintaining the integrity of the medical-legal evaluation are areas of concern. The aim of this paper is to describe the design, development, training, and implementation of a computerized preanesthetic evaluation form associated to the evaluation of the user satisfaction with the system. Since the system went live in September 2008 there were 15121 closed structured forms, 60% for ambulatory procedures and 40 % for procedures that required hospital admission. 82% of total closed structured forms had recorded a risk of the procedures of 1-2, according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. The survey indicates a positive general satisfaction of the users with the system.

[1]  George A Wells,et al.  The Value of Routine Preoperative Electrocardiography in Predicting Myocardial Infarction After Noncardiac Surgery , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[2]  Daniel J. Essin,et al.  Development and Assessment of a Computer-Based Preanesthetic Patient Evaluation System for Obstetrical Anesthesia , 1998, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[3]  Daniel R. Luna,et al.  Creation of a Local Interface Terminology to SNOMED CT , 2007, MedInfo.

[4]  Joachim S. Gravenstein,et al.  The efficiency of preoperative evaluation: A comparison of computerized and paper recording systems , 1994, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[5]  Angela M Bader Computer-Based Preoperative Assessment , 2002, International anesthesiology clinics.

[6]  H. Murff,et al.  Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. , 2001, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[7]  Daniel R. Luna,et al.  Creation and Evaluation of a Terminology Server for the Interactive Coding of Discharge Summaries , 2007, MedInfo.

[8]  Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia Evaluation: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[9]  Daniel R. Luna,et al.  A Practical Approach to Advanced Terminology Services in Health Information Systems , 2007, MedInfo.

[10]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system , 1999, AMIA.

[11]  Joseph L. Kannry,et al.  Research Paper: Physician Satisfaction with Two Order Entry Systems , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[13]  V J Kopp,et al.  Preoperative preparation. Value, perspective, and practice in patient care. , 2000, Anesthesiology clinics of North America.

[14]  A. V. van Ginneken,et al.  Paper Versus Computer: Feasibility of an Electronic Medical Record in General Pediatrics , 2006, Pediatrics.