Success rate and resource consumption from project interdependencies

– The purpose of this paper is to show how interdependencies are used to make the project selection and review more effective in project portfolio management. Managers need to make appropriate pre‐evaluation of disciplines before taking them into use, therefore it is useful to know how much interdependencies can increase the success rate of projects and how big is the resource reduction from the use of interdependencies. This paper is an excerpt of a larger interdependency survey., – A large‐scale survey is carried out in two countries – Estonia and Finland. A total of 288 responses were received., – People see only positive aspects in interdependencies, but this paper proves that it is not always so. It is found that companies which take the phenomenon into account are more successful. Contrary to the respondents' perception and prior literature, a higher need for resources is noticed among the users of interdependency. The results indicate homogeneity between managerial issues of interdependencies in small‐to‐large companies., – The main limitation comes from the sample, as findings from the sample countries and industries may limit generalizability., – Practitioners can expect a higher success rate and resource consumption from interdependencies. Managers from small‐to‐large companies can find size‐related peculiarities and practices for their daily managerial actions., – This paper provides empirical evidence for a less investigated, but emerging field of interdependencies. So far, mostly components of interdependency have been investigated in isolation. The paper highlights the behavior of success rate and resource consumption among the users/non‐users of interdependency, which to the author's knowledge has not been provided so far.

[1]  S. Newell,et al.  Interdependencies in Complex Project Ecologies: The Case of Biomedical Innovation , 2008 .

[2]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research , 2002 .

[3]  Udechukwu Ojiako,et al.  A qualitative re-construction of project measurement criteria , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[5]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[6]  L. Why I Recommended That Your Manuscript Be Rejected and What You Can Do About It , 2022 .

[7]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[9]  K. K. Sinha,et al.  Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R & D environments , 2002 .

[10]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Managing multiple interdependencies in large scale software development projects , 1997 .

[11]  Norman P. Archer,et al.  Project portfolio selection techniques: a review and a suggested integrated approach , 1996 .

[12]  Julie F. Pallant,et al.  SPSS Survival Manual , 2020 .

[13]  Werner H. Hoffmann,et al.  How to Manage a Portfolio of Alliances , 2005 .

[14]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[15]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[16]  R. Sanchez A Process Design Approach to Managing Interdependencies in Complex Organizations , 2005 .

[17]  Problems and promotion of R&D project selection in Finnish high-tech manufacturing companies , 1999, PICMET '99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.99CH36310).

[18]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[19]  M. Engwall No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[20]  J. Tienari,et al.  Penetrating the Academic Publishing Machine: A Rough Guide , 2006 .

[21]  Michael R. Harwell,et al.  Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquir , 2011 .

[22]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  Project Portfolio Selection and Management , 2007 .

[23]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders-I , 1997 .

[24]  P. Guo,et al.  R&D project portfolio selection model analysis within project interdependencies context , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[25]  Yael Grushka-Cockayne,et al.  The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects , 2005 .

[26]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[27]  Perttu Dietrich,et al.  Coordination strategies in organizational development programs , 2007 .

[28]  R. Max Wideman,et al.  Project Portfolio Management: A Practical Guide to Selecting Projects, Managing Portfolios, and Maximizing Benefits , 2005 .

[29]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[30]  Markku V. J. Maula Corporate venture capital and the value-added for technology-based new firms , 2001 .

[31]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments , 2003 .

[32]  N. Nummela,et al.  First the Sugar, Then the Eggs . . . Or the Other Way Round? Mixing Methods in International Business Research , 2004 .

[33]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[34]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[35]  K. Artto,et al.  Strategic Business Management through Multiple Projects , 2007 .

[36]  Nazmun Nahar,et al.  Interactions between contingency, organizational IT factors, and ERP success , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[37]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[38]  Catherine P. Killen,et al.  Understanding project interdependencies: The role of visual representation, culture and process , 2012 .

[39]  Alan Olinsky,et al.  The comparative efficacy of imputation methods for missing data in structural equation modeling , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Robert L. Schmidt,et al.  A model for R&D project selection with combined benefit, outcome and resource interactions , 1993 .