Reflectance confocal microscopy may differentiate acute allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in vivo.

[1]  S. González,et al.  Confocal histopathology of irritant contact dermatitis in vivo and the impact of skin color (black vs white). , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  Natalia Kuzmina,et al.  Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  F. Storrs.  Fisher's Contact Dermatitis, 5th ed , 2002 .

[4]  M. Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Confocal examination of nonmelanoma cancers in thick skin excisions to potentially guide mohs micrographic surgery without frozen histopathology. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  M Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Topographic variations in normal skin, as viewed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  R. Lotan,et al.  Laser scanning confocal microscopy of cervical tissue before and after application of acetic acid. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  O. Clemmensen,et al.  Histological distinction between early allergic and irritant patch test reactions: follicular spongiosis may be characteristic of early allergic contact dermatitis , 1999, Contact Dermatitis.

[8]  J. Flier,et al.  The CXCR3 activating chemokines IP-10, Mig, and IP-9 are expressed in allergic but not in irritant patch test reactions. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[9]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[10]  M Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis: correlation of in vivo confocal imaging to routine histology. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  G. Grove,et al.  Comparative metrology of the evaporimeter and the DermaLab® TEWL probe , 1999 .

[12]  G. Grove,et al.  Computerized evaporimetry using the DermaLab® TEWL probe , 1999 .

[13]  A. Dunn,et al.  Near real time confocal microscopy of cultured amelanotic cells: sources of signal, contrast agents and limits of contrast. , 1998, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  H. Maibach,et al.  Cigarette smoking, cutaneous vasculature and tissue oxygen: an overview , 1998, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[15]  A. Gaspari.  THE ROLE OF KERATINOCYTES IN THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF CONTACT DERMATITIS , 1997 .

[16]  V. Deleo,et al.  Contact and Occupational Dermatology , 1997 .

[17]  E. Claassen,et al.  In vivo cytokine profiles in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis , 1995, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  H. Maibach,et al.  The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview , 1995, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: melanin provides strong contrast. , 1995, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[20]  J. Fowler,et al.  Fisher's Contact Dermatitis , 1995 .

[21]  E. Berardesca,et al.  The modulation of skin irritation , 1994, Contact dermatitis.

[22]  P. Frosch,et al.  Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left-versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[23]  W. Jordan,et al.  Reproducibility of Patch Tests: A United States Multicenter Study , 1992 .

[24]  W. Sterry,et al.  Common pathogenetic pathways in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. , 1992, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using laser‐Doppler flowmetry and erythema index , 1991, Contact dermatitis.

[26]  J. Garioch,et al.  Thermographic assessment of patch‐test responses , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[27]  C. Willis,et al.  Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[28]  B. Staberg,et al.  Allergic and irritant skin reactions evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[29]  E. Ralfkiaer,et al.  Sequential immunophenotypic study of lymphoid infiltrate in allergic and irritant reactions , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  J. Serup,et al.  Differentiation of allergic and irritant reactions by transepidermal water loss , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[31]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Phenotypic characterization of the early cellular responses in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. , 1986, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[32]  C. Willis,et al.  Immunopathological and ultrastructural findings in human allergic and irritant contact dermatitis , 1986, The British journal of dermatology.

[33]  M. Romanini,et al.  The effect of different fixatives on chromatin: Cytochemical and ultrastructural approaches , 1981, The Histochemical Journal.

[34]  P. Hoedemaeker,et al.  Histological differences between irritant and allergic patch test reactions in man * , 1976, Contact dermatitis.

[35]  M. Mihm,et al.  Morphology of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in man. , 1976, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[36]  M. Mihm,et al.  Morphology of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in man. II. Ultrastructural alterations affecting the microvasculature and the tissue mast cells. , 1976, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[37]  M. Mihm,et al.  Morphology of delayed type hypersensitivity reactions in man. I. Quantitative description of the inflammatory response. , 1974, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[38]  N. Yawalkar,et al.  Human skin lymph derived from irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: interleukin 10 is increased selectively in elicitation reactions. , 1997, Dermatology.

[39]  K. Bendtzen,et al.  Keratinocyte-expression of interleukin-6 but not of tumour necrosis factor-alpha is increased in the allergic and the irritant patch test reaction. , 1991, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[40]  L. Kanerva,et al.  T and B lymphocytes, macrophages and Langerhans' cells during the course of contact allergic and irritant skin reactions in man. , 1983, Acta dermato-venereologica.