On the Geographic Allocation of Open Source Software Activities

This article contributes to research on the geographic origin of open source software OSS developers by analyzing the geographic allocation of active OSS developers and OSS activities. Based on data from the SourceForge Research Data Archive, the authors exploit information about developers' IP address, email address, and indicated time-zone. This enables them to assign 94% of all registered users in 2006. As proxy for activity the authors use information about the number of posted messages. Thus they provide a detailed picture of the world-wide allocation of OSS activities. Such country data about the supply-side of OSS is a valuable stock for both cross-country studies on OSS and country-specific research and policy advice.

[1]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  From planning to mature: On the success of open source projects , 2007 .

[2]  Peter B. Swanson.  Free and Open Source Software for E-Learning : Issues , Successes and Challenges , 2012 .

[3]  Alexia Gaudeul,et al.  Consumer Welfare and Market Structure in a Model of Competition between Open Source and Proprietary Software , 2008, Int. J. Open Source Softw. Process..

[4]  Jin Xu,et al.  Application of Social Network Analysis to the Study of Open Source Software , 2006 .

[5]  Hussein Al-Bahadili,et al.  Competition-Based Learning: A Model for the Integration of Competitions with Project-Based Learning using Open Source LMS , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[6]  Francesco Rullani,et al.  Explaining leadership in virtual teams: The case of open source software , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[7]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Direct and indirect knowledge spillovers: the “social network” of open-source projects , 2011 .

[8]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Geographic origin of libre software developers , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[9]  Matthijs den Besten,et al.  The allocation of collaborative efforts in open-source software , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[10]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Dynamics of Open-Source Contributors , 2006 .

[11]  Megan Squire,et al.  How the FLOSS Research Community Uses Email Archives , 2012, Int. J. Open Source Softw. Process..

[12]  Shahron Williams van Rooij,et al.  Higher Education and FOSS for e-Learning: The Role of Organizational Sub-cultures in Enterprise-wide Adoption , 2010, Int. J. Open Source Softw. Process..

[13]  David Lancashire.  Code, Culture and Cash: The Fading Altruism of Open Source Development , 2001, First Monday.

[14]  Rishab Aiyer Ghosh,et al.  Economic impact of open source software on innovation and the competitiveness of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector in the EU , 2007 .

[15]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  NET Institute* www.NETinst.org , 2008 .

[16]  Xiaogang Chen,et al.  Virtual organizational learning in open source software development projects , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[18]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Microstructure of Collaboration: The 'Social Network' of Open Source Software , 2008 .

[19]  Justin P. Johnson.  Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good , 2002 .

[20]  Sebastian von Engelhardt,et al.  Institutions, Culture, and Open Source , 2013 .

[21]  Francesco Rullani,et al.  Skills, Division of Labor and Performance in Collective Inventions. Evidence from the Open Source Software , 2004 .

[22]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Geographic location of developers at SourceForge , 2006, MSR '06.

[23]  Paul A. David,et al.  Dynamics of Innovation in an Open Source Collaboration Environment: Lurking, Laboring, and Launching Floss Projects on Sourceforge , 2007 .

[24]  E. Swanson,et al.  World development indicators 2007 , 2006 .