Life cycle assessment of Japanese pig farming using low-protein diet supplemented with amino acids

Livestock production is indicated to be one of the major emitters of greenhouse gases (GHG), particularly methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), around the globe, and the reduction of these emissions is an important goal. GHG emissions as well as other environmental impacts of two pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) farming systems, one using conventional diets (CNV) and the other using low-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids (LOW), were therefore evaluated by comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) focusing on manure management and by cradle-to-farm gate LCA. The functional unit was defined as one marketed pig. For the comparative LCA of manure management, the CH4 and N2O emissions from manure management of CNV were set as a baseline, and the system boundary of LOW included the CH4 and N2O emissions from manure management, and changes in the GHG emissions from feed production including amino acid manufacturing, feed transport, and the materials and energy consumed in manure management. For the cradle-to-farm gate LCA of pig farming, the evaluated system included the processes of feed production including amino acid manufacturing for LOW, feed transport, animal housing including the biological activity of the animal, and manure management. The results of the comparative LCA showed that the GHG emissions from manure management of LOW were 20% less than those of CNV, and the GHG reduction rate of LOW compared to CNV was even greater in the case of a stricter target of effluent nitrogen content. The results of cradle-to-farm gate LCA showed that LOW had lower GHG emissions, acidification potential, eutrophication potential and overall environmental impact, and slightly larger energy consumption, than CNV. The sensitivity analysis showed that LOW still had less GHG emissions than CNV, even in the least preferable case assuming a 40% lower reduction rate of nitrogen excretion.

[1]  B. Kerr,et al.  Influences of dietary protein level, amino acid supplementation and environmental temperature on performance, body composition, organ weights and total heat production of growing pigs. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[2]  N. Holden,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional, agri-environmental scheme, and organic Irish suckler-beef units. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[3]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[4]  Niels H. Batjes,et al.  Estimation of global NH3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands , 2002 .

[5]  Eiji Kikuchi,et al.  Estimation of Global Warming Emissions Associated with a Pig Production System by Life Cycle Assessment , 2007 .

[6]  Kazuyoshi Suzuki,et al.  Evaluation of full-scale biofilter with rockwool mixture treating ammonia gas from livestock manure composting. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[7]  南齋 規介,et al.  産業連関表による環境負荷原単位データブック(3EID) : LCAのインベントリデータとして = Embodied energy and emission intensity data for Japan using input-output tables(3EID) : Inventory data for LCA , 2002 .

[8]  J. van Milgen,et al.  Effect of high temperature and low-protein diets on the performance of growing-finishing pigs. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[9]  A.J.A. Aarnink,et al.  Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing-finishing pigs. , 1998 .

[10]  A. Ogino,et al.  Environmental impacts of a Japanese dairy farming system using whole-crop rice silage as evaluated by life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[11]  Yun-Chul Chung,et al.  Enhanced COD and nitrogen removals for the treatment of swine wastewater by combining submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and anaerobic upflow bed filter (AUBF) reactor , 2005 .

[12]  P. Lammers,et al.  Nonsolar energy use and one-hundred-year global warming potential of Iowa swine feedstuffs and feeding strategies. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[13]  M. Yokoyama,et al.  Nitrogen balance and ileal amino acid digestibility in growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[14]  M. Yokoyama,et al.  Ammonia, volatile fatty acids, phenolics, and odor offensiveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[15]  Lisbeth Mogensen,et al.  Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU , 2010 .

[16]  Jung-Jeng Su,et al.  Utilization of sequencing batch reactor for in situ piggery wastewater treatment , 1997 .

[17]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  Development of a second-generation environmentally superior technology for treatment of swine manure in the USA. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[19]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .

[20]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[21]  A. Ogino,et al.  Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[22]  Atsuo Ikeguchi,et al.  Environmental impact evaluation of feeds prepared from food residues using life cycle assessment. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[23]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[24]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[25]  H. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment. , 2011, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[26]  A. Inaba,et al.  Weighting across safeguard subjects for LCIA through the application of conjoint analysis , 2004 .

[27]  Jun-Heon Lee,et al.  The Role of Synthetic Amino Acids in Monogastric Animal Production - Review - , 2000 .

[28]  Tomohiko Ihara,et al.  Comparison of the Environmental Impact at the Livestock Manure Treatment System with Swine Manure by Life Cycle Assessment Method , 2007 .

[29]  I. Shinzato,et al.  Potential reduction of greenhouse gas emission from swine manure by using a low-protein diet supplemented with synthetic amino acids , 2011 .

[30]  John D Simmons,et al.  Ammonia emissions from swine houses in the southeastern United States. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[31]  C. Rotz Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[32]  Helena Elmquist,et al.  Environmental Systems Analysis of Pig Production - The Impact of Feed Choice (12 pp) , 2005 .

[33]  Fabrice Béline,et al.  Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[34]  G. Bortone,et al.  Integrated anaerobic/aerobic biological treatment for intensive swine production. , 2009, Bioresource technology.