Contextual Assimilation and Its Effect on the Division of Attention between Nonverbal Signals

Subjects performed a recognition task in which a low or a high frequency signal was presented simultaneously with a dim or a bright intensity one. The independent variable was the degree of association between the signals on the two dimensions. Unknown to the subjects four levels were tested in separate conditions, 1.0, 0.8, 0.5 and 0.2. Increasing the positive association improved overall sensitivity as measured by d′ on both dimensions, but left contingent sensitivity unchanged. Changing the association did not affect overall bias, as measured by Beta. However, holding context constant by analysis produced significant differences between individual measures of contingent bias in the direction of assimilation, for example “low” responses tended to accompany dim signals and “dim” responses. The differences were unaffected by the changes in association. The results are interpreted as favouring models of contextual assimilation which assume that biasing at some level of processing depends upon the mutually contingent interaction of discrete events rather than on memory and expectation of the relative frequency of conjoint events. Further support for this conclusion comes from previous studies which indicate that assimilation occurs with separate responses but not with unitary ones. The implications of the findings for research on the division of attention are discussed, particularly the need to control variability in measured bias to establish a true change in the allocation of attention. Two generalized models of contextual assimilation are proposed, one based on “object” and the other on “lexical” assimilation. The possible application of these models to synaesthesia is considered.

[1]  J. Long,et al.  Effect of Task Difficulty on the Division of Attention between Nonverbal Signals: Independence or Interaction? , 1976 .

[2]  L. Marks On colored-hearing synesthesia: cross-modal translations of sensory dimensions. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[4]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Some aspects of ROC curve-fitting: Normal and logistic models , 1972 .

[5]  W G Chase,et al.  Semantics in the perception of verticality. , 1971, British journal of psychology.

[6]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Multidimensional stimulus identification , 1969 .

[7]  J. Long Division of Attention between Simultaneous and Successive Nonverbal Signals Varying in Discriminability* , 1977, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Long,et al.  Division of Attention between Non-Verbal Signals: All-Or-None or Shared Processing? , 1976 .

[9]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Simultaneous two-channel signal detection. 3. 630- and 1400-Hz signals. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Long,et al.  Reduced Efficiency and Capacity Limitations in Multidimension Signal Recognition , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On colored-hearing synesthesia: cross-modal translations of sensory dimensions. , 1975 .

[12]  D W Corcoran,et al.  On the combination of evidence from the eye and ear. , 1969, Ergonomics.

[13]  N. Moray,et al.  Attention to Pure Tones , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Sequential vs simultaneous two-channel signal detection: more evidence for a high-level interrupt theory. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Peter H. Lindsay,et al.  Attention and multidimensional discrimination1 , 1968 .

[16]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  L. Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Brebner,et al.  Bisensory presentation of information. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J C Webster,et al.  Perceptual confusions between four-dimensional sounds. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Dornič,et al.  Attention and performance V , 1976 .

[21]  N. Harvey The semantics of high-low continua. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[22]  Graham A. Murrell,et al.  Combination of evidence in a probabilistic visual search and detection task , 1977 .

[23]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[24]  L E Marks,et al.  On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness. , 1974, The American journal of psychology.