Grammatical error diagnosis in fluid construction grammar: a case study in L2 Spanish verb morphology

Construction grammar (CG) has been proposed as an adequate grammatical formalism for building intelligent language tutoring systems because it is highly compatible with the learning strategies observed in second language learning. Unfortunately, the lack of computational CG implementations has made it impossible in the past to corroborate these proposals with actual language tutoring prototypes. However, recent advances in Fluid Construction Grammar (FCG) now offer exciting new ways of operationalizing robust and open-ended language processing within a CG approach. This paper demonstrates its adequacy for ICALL applications through a case study on error diagnosis in the domain of Spanish tense, aspect and modal morphology. The performance of the FCG tutor is tested on the Spanish Learner Language Oral Corpus (SPLOCC 2). This first FCG Spanish error diagnostic prototype achieves an accuracy of 70% on a total of 500 conjugation errors in four oral tasks carried out by 20 low intermediate and 20 advanced English learners of Spanish. Follow-up experiments will test this prototype on larger learner corpora of differing proficiency levels.

[1]  Clive Matthews,et al.  Grammar Frameworks In Intelligent CALL , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[2]  Remi van Trijp A Reflective Architecture for Robust Language Processing and Learning , 2012, Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar.

[3]  Mathias Schulze,et al.  Construction grammar in ICALL , 2008 .

[4]  Luc Steels,et al.  Introducing Fluid Construction Grammar , 2011 .

[5]  Andreas Digeser,et al.  Understanding second language acquisition , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[6]  R. Toro,et al.  Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española , 2000 .

[7]  Florence Myles SPLLOC: A new database for Spanish second language acquisition , 2008 .

[8]  Beverley Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors , 2008 .

[9]  Wolfgang Menzel,et al.  Error Diagnosis for Language Learning Systems , 1999 .

[10]  Luc Steels,et al.  Design patterns in fluid construction grammar , 2011 .

[11]  Luz Rello,et al.  Onoma: un conjugador de verbos y neologismos verbales , 2010, Proces. del Leng. Natural.

[12]  S. P. Corder THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS , 1967 .

[13]  Katrien Beuls,et al.  A Language Strategy for Aspect: Encoding Aktionsarten through Morphology , 2012 .

[14]  Mark James,et al.  An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Language Instruction , 1978, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Luc Steels,et al.  Open-ended Procedural Semantics , 2012, Language Grounding in Robots.

[16]  G. Antos Grundlagen einer Theorie des Formulierens : Textherstellung in geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache , 1982 .

[17]  Miriam R. L. Petruck FRAME SEMANTICS , 1996 .

[18]  Katrien Beuls,et al.  Diagnostics and Repairs in Fluid Construction Grammar , 2012, Language Grounding in Robots.

[19]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[20]  Trude Heift,et al.  Heift Trude Schulze Mathias. Errors and Intelligence in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Parsers and Pedagogues Routledge (Routledge series in computer-assisted language learning), 2007. xviii+283 Pages. ISBN: 978-0-415-36191-0. Price: $115 , 2009, ReCALL.

[21]  Jesús Soria Expert CALL: data-based versus knowledge-based interaction and feedback , 1997 .

[22]  Antonio Zamora,et al.  Automatic spelling correction in scientific and scholarly text , 1984, CACM.

[23]  Emmanuel J. Yannakoudakis,et al.  The rules of spelling errors , 1983, Inf. Process. Manag..