The Interactive Effects of Extraversion and Conscientiousness on Performance

The abridged big five dimensional circumplex (AB5C; Hofstee, de Raad & Goldberg, 199 2; Johnson & Ostendorf, 199 3) integrates the Big Five model of phenotypic personality attributes and circumplex models of personality. The present study of one sample of job applicants and three samples of workers in jobs requiring interpersonal interaction considered two dimensions within the AB5C—extraversion and conscientiousness—and examined the relationships of their interaction with job interview performance and supervisor ratings of job performance. Results of moderated multiple regression analyses supported the hypothesis. Additional units of extraversion led to increments in performance among high-conscientious workers but to decrements in performance among low-conscientious workers.

[1]  M. Lorr,et al.  An inventory of interpersonal style. , 1973, Journal of personality assessment.

[2]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[3]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[4]  J. Bermúdez,et al.  Personality Psychology in Europe , 1997 .

[5]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  Personality testing in employment settings: Problems and issues in the application of typical selection practices , 2001 .

[6]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Personality Measurement and Employment Decisions. Questions and Answers. , 1996 .

[7]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Four ways five factors are not basic , 1992 .

[8]  Susan S. White,et al.  Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  L. R. Goldberg The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[10]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Clarification of the Five-Factor Model With the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex , 1993 .

[11]  D. W. Fiske Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. , 1949, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[14]  L. A. Pervin Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[15]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Relation of Cognitive Ability and Personality Traits to Assessment Center Performance , 2000 .

[16]  B. D. Raad,et al.  A psycholexical route to content coverage in personality assessment , 1997 .

[17]  N. Stanton,et al.  THE OPQ AND THE BIG FIVE , 1991 .

[18]  Wayne A. Hochwarter,et al.  Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Jeanette N. Cleveland,et al.  Performance Measurement and Theory , 1983 .

[21]  J. Block A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  G Saucier,et al.  Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: premises, products, and prospects. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[23]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[24]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The Relation of Candidate Personality With Selection-Interview Outcomes , 2000 .

[25]  Philip C. Kendall,et al.  Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology , 1982 .

[26]  G. Saucier Openness versus intellect: Much ado about nothing? , 1992 .

[27]  Peter Becker,et al.  Beyond the Big Five , 1999 .

[28]  J. Burger,et al.  PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF JOB APPLICANTS AND SUCCESS IN SCREENING INTERVIEWS , 1998 .

[29]  B. De Raad,et al.  The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) , 1999 .

[30]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Conscientiousness and Task Performance: Test of Cognitive Process Model , 1996 .

[31]  Orlando Behling,et al.  Employee selection: Will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job? , 1998 .

[32]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  FIVE REASONS WHY THE “BIG FIVE” ARTICLE HAS BEEN FREQUENTLY CITED , 1998 .

[33]  P. Costa,et al.  Updating Norman's "Adequate Taxonomy": intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Timothy Leary,et al.  Interpersonal diagnosis of personality , 1957 .

[35]  C. Russell,et al.  Two field tests of an explanation of assessment centre validity , 1995 .

[36]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[37]  L. R. Goldberg THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[38]  T. Berge,et al.  How to score questionnaires , 1998 .

[39]  C. A. Higgins,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN , 1999 .

[40]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[41]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. , 1993 .

[43]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[44]  S. Golding Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations. , 1975 .

[45]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[46]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality Structure: The Return of the Big Five , 1997 .

[47]  L. Clark,et al.  Extraversion and Its Positive Emotional Core , 1997 .

[48]  J. Michael Crant,et al.  The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. , 1995 .

[49]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Relations of emotional intelligence, practical intelligence, general intelligence, and trait affectivity with interview outcomes: it's not all just ‘G’ , 2000 .