Cyberspace design: a new challenge for planners

This paper proposes a conceptual framework for planning and design practice to incorporate self-consciously the hybrid space of the virtual and physical. Cyberspace has now become a commonplace environment for social and public life, and its complex uses are entwined with those of the existential life in the physical environment. Therefore, it is argued, planners must engage in the design of the parallel realities of social and public life in these spaces. This paper proposes to look at them in a rhizome-like spatial formation, and in their future design to apply related planning knowledge on places and communities. Based on observations of online activity, the paper illustrates a method to analyse cyberspace's quality by means of Kevin Lynch's taxonomy of images, and of William H. Whyte's method to evaluate spatial uses. Spatial elements are identified through analogies between the virtual and the physical social environments, in order to derive alternatives for future (hybrid) spatial design.

[1]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. , 2001 .

[2]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[3]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Divining a Digital Future - Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[5]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on , 2006, CSCW '06.

[6]  W. Whyte The social life of small urban spaces , 1980 .

[7]  D. Harvey Space as a Keyword , 2008 .

[8]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[9]  Tridib Banerjee,et al.  Beyond the Neighborhood Unit: Residential Environments And Public Policy , 2013 .

[10]  P. Adams Cyberspace and Virtual Places , 1997 .

[11]  Thomas Taaffe,et al.  Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire , 2006 .

[12]  Alessandro Aurigi,et al.  Augmented Urban Spaces: Articulating the Physical and Electronic City , 2008 .

[13]  W. Whyte City: Rediscovering the Center , 1988 .

[14]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  From Cyber to Hybrid , 2006 .

[15]  Joe Podolsky,et al.  City of bits: space, place and the infobahn , 1995, CSOC.

[16]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[17]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb , 2003 .

[18]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City , 2008 .

[19]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[20]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Participation, animation, design: a tripartite approach to urban community networking , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[21]  M. Arefi,et al.  Journal of Planning Education and Research Reflections on the Pedagogy of Place in Planning and Urban Design on Behalf Of: Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning , 2022 .

[22]  Ileana Apostol,et al.  FROM FACE-BLOCK TO FACEBOOK OR THE OTHER WAY AROUND? , 2008 .

[23]  Panayotis Antoniadis,et al.  Flânerie between Net and Place : Possibilities for Participation in Planning * , 2008 .

[24]  M. Christine Boyer,et al.  CyberCities: Visual Perception in the Age of Electronic Communication , 1995 .