Real-Time Estimation of Drivers' Behaviour

The increasing market penetration of in-vehicle sensor technology, e.g., cameras and lidars, is likely to provide more and more insights on drivers' behaviours. Real time knowledge of drivers' behaviour can be useful to a wide range of applications, such as driving assistance in traffic situations identified as critical, detection of tiredness levels or identification of drivers for insurance purposes. In situations where drivers only interact with other vehicles, for instance on highways, the drivers' behaviours can be modelled through microscopic car-following models. Those models are known to be able to capture the physical features of traffic flow, while accurately describing specific drivers' behaviour via behavioural parameters. A lot of research to date has focused on fitting the parameters of these models to real trajectory datasets using off-line techniques, with the objective to reproduce drivers variability in simulation. However very little has been published on online parameter estimation of car-following models. This paper investigates how in-vehicle sensors could help estimate car-following behavioural parameters. The focus is on the Intelligent Driver Model. A discussion of the sensitivity of the estimation is provided in light of previous work, and it is argued that, depending on the traffic state, not all the parameters need to be calibrated. An extended Kalman filter with physical inequality constraints on the behavioural parameters is then formulated for the class of time continuous car-following models. The filter exhibits systematic convergence for real trajectories of leaders and synthetic-simulated-trajectories of followers, for randomly picked parameters within the physical bounds, and for fixed and dynamic observation time steps ranging from 0.1 s up to 1 s. This demonstrates that online parameter estimation of behavioural parameters has great potential.

[1]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[2]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Do We Really Need to Calibrate All the Parameters? Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis to Simplify Microscopic Traffic Flow Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  A simplified behavioral vehicle longitudinal motion model , 2009 .

[4]  Muhammad Mahbubur Rashid,et al.  Automatic Parking Management System and Parking Fee Collection Based on Number Plate Recognition , 2012 .

[5]  Lee A. Feldkamp,et al.  Decoupled extended Kalman filter training of feedforward layered networks , 1991, IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[6]  Vincenzo Punzo,et al.  On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program data , 2011 .

[7]  Vinny Cahill,et al.  Real-time coordination of autonomous vehicles , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[8]  Francois Dion,et al.  Using Global Positioning System Data for Field Evaluation of Energy and Emission Impact of Traffic Flow Improvement Projects: Issues and Proposed Solutions , 2001 .

[9]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Can Results of car-following Model Calibration Based on Trajectory Data be Trusted? , 2012 .

[10]  John L. Crassidis,et al.  Survey of nonlinear attitude estimation methods , 2007 .

[11]  D. Simon,et al.  Kalman filtering with state equality constraints , 2002 .

[12]  Romain Billot,et al.  Calibration, Estimation, and Sampling Issues of Car-Following Parameters , 2014 .

[13]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model , 2002 .

[14]  Michael Maile,et al.  Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance System Limited to Stop Sign and Traffic Signal Violations , 2008 .

[15]  K. Hasebe,et al.  Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay , 1998, patt-sol/9805002.

[16]  Dan C. Marinescu,et al.  On-ramp traffic merging using cooperative intelligent vehicles: A slot-based approach , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Microscopic Calibration and Validation of Car-Following Models – A Systematic Approach , 2013, 1403.4990.

[18]  Sharad Singhal,et al.  Training Multilayer Perceptrons with the Extende Kalman Algorithm , 1988, NIPS.

[19]  Shaowei Yu,et al.  Full velocity difference and acceleration model for a car-following theory , 2013, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[20]  Punzo Vincenzo,et al.  May we trust results of car-following models calibration based on trajectory data? , 2012 .

[21]  I. Rhodes A tutorial introduction to estimation and filtering , 1971 .

[22]  John Lygeros,et al.  A simulation based study of subliminal control for air traffic management , 2010 .

[23]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Correlated Parameters in Driving Behavior Models , 2011 .

[25]  Hugo Miranda,et al.  Middleware for Network Eccentric and Mobile Applications , 2009 .

[26]  Romain Billot,et al.  Microscopic cooperative traffic flow: calibration and simulation based on a next generation simulation dataset , 2014 .

[27]  Vinny Cahill,et al.  Vehicular Networks and Applications , 2009, Middleware for Network Eccentric and Mobile Applications.