Evaluation of the CFP-substrate-YFP system for protease studies: advantages and limitations.

A protease can be defined as an enzyme capable of hydrolyzing peptide bonds. Thus, characterization of a protease involves identification of target peptide sequences, measurement of activities toward these sequences, and determination of kinetic parameters. Biological protease substrates based on fluorescent protein pairs, which allow for use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), have been recently developed for in vivo protease activity detection and represent a very interesting alternative to chemical substrates for in vitro protease characterization. Here, we analyze a FRET system consisting of cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP, respectively), which are fused by a peptide linker serving as protease substrate. Conditions for CFP-YFP fusion protein production in Escherichia coli and purification of proteins were optimized. FRET between CFP and YFP was found to be optimum at a pH between 5.5 and 10.0, at low concentrations of salt and a temperature superior to 25 degrees C. For efficient FRET to occur, the peptide linker between CFP and YFP can measure up to 25 amino acids. The CFP-substrate-YFP system demonstrated a high degree of resistance to nonspecific proteolysis, making it suitable for enzyme kinetic analysis. As with chemical substrates, substrate specificity of CFP-substrate-YFP proteins was tested towards different proteases and kcat/Km values were calculated.

[1]  Rebekka M. Wachter,et al.  Sensitivity of the yellow variant of green fluorescent protein to halides and nitrate , 1999, Current Biology.

[2]  A S Verkman,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a noninvasive intracellular pH indicator. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[3]  D. Payan,et al.  Detection of programmed cell death using fluorescence energy transfer. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  Th. Förster.  Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz , 1948 .

[5]  S J Remington,et al.  Structural and spectral response of green fluorescent protein variants to changes in pH. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[6]  M. N. Williams,et al.  Green fluorescent protein rendered susceptible to proteolysis: positions for protease-sensitive insertions. , 2001, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[7]  R. Tsien,et al.  Reducing the Environmental Sensitivity of Yellow Fluorescent Protein , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  P. Selvin.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[9]  W. Ward,et al.  Renaturation of Aequorea green-fluorescent protein , 1981 .

[10]  R. Mitra,et al.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer between blue-emitting and red-shifted excitation derivatives of the green fluorescent protein. , 1996, Gene.

[11]  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer between blue-emitting and redshifted excitation derivatives of the green fluorescent protein * , 2003 .

[12]  R. Zahler.  Enzyme Structure and Mechanism , 1979, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[13]  R. Clegg.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2020, Current Opinion in Biotechnology.

[14]  N. Mahajan,et al.  Novel mutant green fluorescent protein protease substrates reveal the activation of specific caspases during apoptosis. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[15]  Richard N. Day,et al.  Nanosecond fluorescence resonance energy transfer‐fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy to localize the protein interactions in a single living cell , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  S J Remington,et al.  Mechanism and Cellular Applications of a Green Fluorescent Protein-based Halide Sensor* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.