Bioreactor maintained living skin matrix.

Numerous reconstructive procedures result in wounds that require skin grafting. Often, the amount of tissue available from donor sites is limited. In vivo tissue expanders have been used clinically to generate larger sections of skin, and other methods exist to cover large wounds, but all have significant limitations. We investigated whether these difficulties could be overcome by increasing the surface area of skin in vitro while maintaining tissue viability. Human foreskin was incrementally expanded in a computer-controlled bioreactor system over 6 days to increase its surface dimensions under culture conditions. Morphological, ultrastructural, and mechanical properties of the foreskin were evaluated before and after expansion using histology, scanning electron microscopy, mercury porosimetry, and tensile testing. The surface area of the tissue was 110.7% +/- 12.2% greater, with maintenance of cell viability and proliferative potential. Histomorphological and ultrastructural analyses showed that dermal structural integrity was preserved. The pore diameter of the expanded skin was 64.49% +/- 32.8% greater. The mechanical properties were not adversely affected. These findings show that expansion of living skin matrices can be achieved using a computer-controlled bioreactor system. This technique provides an opportunity to generate large amounts of skin for reconstructive procedures.

[1]  G. Cherry,et al.  Electron microscopic evaluation of guinea pig skin and soft tissues "expanded" with a self-inflating silicone implant. , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  B. Nelson,et al.  Histology and physiology of tissue expansion. , 1993, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[3]  C Radovan,et al.  Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy Using the Temporary Expander , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  G. Stark,et al.  Biobrane in the Treatment of Burn and Scald Injuries in Children , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[5]  Z Ruszczak,et al.  Update on tissue-engineered biological dressings. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[6]  Huipin Yuan,et al.  Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  M. Sabolinski,et al.  A bilayered living skin construct (APLIGRAF®) accelerates complete closure of hard‐to‐heal venous ulcers , 1999, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[8]  J. Hansbrough,et al.  Safety and efficacy of TransCyte for the treatment of partial-thickness burns. , 1999, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[9]  G. Blomqvist,et al.  Skin expansion: long term follow up of complications and costs of care , 1993 .

[10]  L. Argenta,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Thickness of Human Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Following Controlled Expansion with a Silicone Implant , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  C. Cacou,et al.  Dermal fibroblasts respond to mechanical conditioning in a strain profile dependent manner. , 2003, Biorheology.

[12]  D. J. Wainwright Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. , 1995, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[13]  Arun K Gosain,et al.  Pediatric Tissue Expansion: Indications and Complications , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[14]  M. Sabolinski,et al.  The effect of a tissue engineered bilayered living skin analog, over meshed split-thickness autografts on the healing of excised burn wounds. The Apligraf Burn Study Group. , 2000, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[15]  F. Silver,et al.  Mechanobiology of force transduction in dermal tissue , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[16]  N. Pallua,et al.  The effect of cross-linking of collagen matrices on their angiogenic capability. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[17]  J. Hansbrough,et al.  Clinical trials of a biosynthetic temporary skin replacement, Dermagraft-Transitional Covering, compared with cryopreserved human cadaver skin for temporary coverage of excised burn wounds. , 1997, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[18]  F. Hirche,et al.  Fibroblasts in Mechanically Stressed Collagen Lattices Assume a “Synthetic” Phenotype* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  B. Atiyeh,et al.  New technologies for burn wound closure and healing--review of the literature. , 2005, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[20]  R E Baier,et al.  Mechanical characteristics of human skin subjected to static versus cyclic normal pressures. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  D. Salomon,et al.  An autologous epidermal equivalent tissue‐engineered from follicular outer root sheath keratinocytes is as effective as split‐thickness skin autograft in recalcitrant vascular leg ulcers , 2003, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[22]  G. Cherry,et al.  Histomorphologic evaluation of guinea pig skin and soft tissue after controlled tissue expansion. , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  J. Hunt,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an acellular allograft dermal matrix in full-thickness burns. , 1996, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[24]  D. Bader,et al.  Influence of external uniaxial cyclic strain on oriented fibroblast-seeded collagen gels. , 2003, Tissue engineering.