The effect of speech recognition on working postures, productivity and the perception of user friendliness.

A comparative, experimental study with repeated measures has been conducted to evaluate the effect of the use of speech recognition on working postures, productivity and the perception of user friendliness. Fifteen subjects performed a standardised task, first with keyboard and mouse and, after a six week training period, with speech recognition. The use of speech recognition leads to improved postures of wrist, forearm, upper arm and shoulder and improvement of neck movements when compared to the use of keyboard and mouse. Although the observation method was basic, this study provides insight into the potential benefits speech recognition has for posture. However, productivity decreased for most subjects and speech recognition appears to be usable for specific tasks only. From the perspective of productivity and the perception of user friendliness further development of speech recognition software is necessary. Up to now, speech recognition seems especially beneficial for people with WMSD complaints. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[2]  M J Haxer,et al.  Use of speech recognition software: a vocal endurance test for the new millennium? , 2001, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[3]  B. JUUL-KRISTENSEN†*,,et al.  Physical workload during use of speech recognition and traditional computer input devices , 2004, Ergonomics.

[4]  Jan Noyes,et al.  Automatic Speech Recognition in Adverse Environments , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[5]  D Kambeyanda,et al.  Potential problems associated with use of speech recognition products. , 1997, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[6]  Anil Mital,et al.  Ergonomics Guidelines and Problem Solving , 2000 .

[7]  Jan Noyes,et al.  Workload and the use of automatic speech recognition: The effects of time and resource demands , 1996, Speech Commun..

[8]  Jan Noyes,et al.  Errors and error correction in automatic speech recognition systems , 1994 .

[9]  Fredric Gerr,et al.  A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  K. Izdebski,et al.  Muscle Tension Dysphonia in Patients who use Computerized Speech recognition Systems , 2004, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[11]  Mathilde M. Bekker,et al.  A comparison of mouse and speech input control of a text-annotation system , 1990, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[12]  D Rempel,et al.  Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among computer users. , 1999, Occupational medicine.

[13]  L. Forcier,et al.  Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) : a reference book for prevention , 1995 .

[14]  U Bergqvist,et al.  National Institute for Working Life Ergonomic Expert Committee Document No 1Visual Display Unit Work and Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersA Review of Epidemiological Findings , 1997 .

[15]  P. Bongers,et al.  Duration of computer use and mouse use in relation to musculoskeletal disorders of neck or upper limb , 2002 .

[16]  T J Armstrong,et al.  Intracarpal canal pressures: the role of finger, hand, wrist and forearm position. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  J. Sluiter,et al.  Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  T R Hales,et al.  Epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. , 1996, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[19]  Birgitte M. Blatter,et al.  Work related neck and upper limb symptoms (RSI) : high risk occupations and risk factors in the Belgian working population , 1999 .