Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Symposium: Determinants in APD Selection

Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is the most prevalent form of peritoneal dialysis in the United States. Optimizing the success of this treatment requires appropriate patient selection; however, there are few data available on which patients are most likely to benefit the most from this form of therapy. The key factors to evaluate when APD is being considered include patient preferences and lifestyle, patient age, solute transport characteristics, residual renal function (RRF), cost, dialysis adequacy targets, and the potential for complications of therapy. Patients who prefer home dialysis at night, children, those with high average or high peritoneal transport characteristics, and those with significant RRF are ideal candidates for APD. Because of the flexibility that is possible in prescribing this form of dialysis, APD can be successfully performed in individuals who do not meet this ideal profile, and it can be an excellent form of dialysis, particularly as part of an integrated care program for patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD).

[1]  M. Neumann Losing ground. A look at the recent decline in PD therapy. , 2002, Nephrology news & issues.

[2]  Diaz-Buxo Ja The present and the future of APD. Automated Peritoneal Dialysis. , 2000 .

[3]  C. Ronco,et al.  Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Clinical Prescription and Technology , 2000, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[4]  M. Suranyi,et al.  HomeChoice Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Machines: The Impact of Reuse of Tubing and Cassettes , 2000, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[5]  J. Bjorner,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing APD and CAPD Treatment , 1999, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[6]  S. Moe,et al.  Small and Middle Molecular Weight Solute Clearance in Nocturnal Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis , 1999, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[7]  M. Feriani,et al.  Automated peritoneal dialysis as a means to maintain a peritoneal dialysis program. , 1999, Contributions to nephrology.

[8]  F. Mignon,et al.  The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function , 1999 .

[9]  M. Rocco,et al.  Cycler adequacy and prescription data in a national cohort sample: the 1997 core indicators report. Health Care Financing Administration Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study Group. , 1999, Kidney international.

[10]  P. Blake Advantages and Disadvantages of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Compared to Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis , 1999, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[11]  C. Ronco,et al.  Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: When and how to do it , 1999, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[12]  F. Mignon,et al.  The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function. , 1999, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[13]  S. Fromm,et al.  Automated peritoneal dialysis with 'on-line'-prepared bicarbonate-buffered dialysate: technique and first clinical experiences. , 1998, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[14]  E. Laborda,et al.  Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicentre study. , 1998, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[15]  J. Holley,et al.  Reducing a peritoneal dialysis program's cost by changing from a vendor-provided to a program-provided system for general medical supplies: significant savings in CCPD. , 1998, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[16]  E. Laborda,et al.  Adequacy of Dialysis in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Clinical Experience , 1997, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[17]  B. Piraino Peritoneal catheter exit-site and tunnel infections. , 1996, Advances in renal replacement therapy.

[18]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Rapid Decline of Residual Renal Function in Patients on Automated Peritoneal Dialysis , 1996, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[19]  R. Brunkhorst,et al.  Clinical experience with home automated peritoneal dialysis. , 1994, Kidney international. Supplement.

[20]  A. Donker,et al.  Clinical Efficacy and Morbidity Associated with Continuous Cyclic Compared with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  J. Díaz-Buxó Differences between CAPD and CCPD: Implications for Therapy , 1993 .

[22]  H. Tenckhoff Automated peritoneal dialysis. , 1978, Proceedings of the Clinical Dialysis and Transplant Forum.