Enhancing Health and Social Care Placement Learning through Mobile Technology

Health and social care students spend up to 50% of their course in practice. Placements are distributed across a wide geographical area and have varying degrees of IT access and support. Consequently, students may feel isolated from peers, academic staff, and resources required for effective learning. Mobile technology has considerable potential to enhance the learning of these students. This paper presents the development and implementation of the Centre for Excellence in Professional Placement Learning’s mobile learning project and the principles that both drove and emerged from this work. Handheld devices were matched to students’ pedagogic need. Principles covered areas such as pedagogy, partnership working, technology, inclusivity, evaluation, and research. Collaboration across sectors and institutions and an understanding of professional cultures and contexts were seen as key in instigating and embedding mobile learning to support students on placement.

[1]  Bin Hu,et al.  Smart-Context: A Context Ontology for Pervasive Mobile Computing , 2010, Comput. J..

[2]  L Rutman,et al.  Understanding Program Evaluation , 1983 .

[3]  D. Laurillard.  Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: framing research questions , 2007 .

[4]  I. Alsaadat.  MOBILE LEARNING AND UNIVERSITY TEACHING , 2009 .

[5]  Beverley Burke,et al.  Evaluating for a change: Reflections on participatory methodology , 1998 .

[6]  D. Tapscott.  Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[7]  Charles P. Smith.  Motivation and personality: Name Index , 1992 .

[8]  Hugh McKenna.  Charting the Way to Excellence: Indicators of Ward Learning Climate , 1994 .

[9]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[10]  P. Benner.  From novice to expert. , 1984, The American journal of nursing.

[11]  Liz Mailer.  The UK's SMARTAL Project: St MARTin's College health students Access to Learning resources whilst on placement. , 2006, Health information and libraries journal.

[12]  Sanjaya Mishra.  Mobile learning: a handbook for educators and trainers , 2005 .

[13]  Sarah Harrison,et al.  Overcrowded placements hinder student learning , 2004 .

[14]  Richard Hall,et al.  Delivering What Students say they Want On-line: Towards Academic Participation in the Enfranchisement of e-Learners? , 2006 .

[15]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[16]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Utilization-focused evaluation , 1998 .

[17]  Pat Gannon-Leary,et al.  Supporting learning in practice in the EBL curriculum: pre-registration students' access to learning resources in the placement setting. , 2005, Nurse education in practice.

[18]  Andy Hutchings,et al.  Supporting learners in clinical practice: capacity issues. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[19]  Judith Borreson Caruso,et al.  Students and Information Technology, 2005: Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning , 2005 .

[20]  Linda C. Hodges,et al.  From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice , 1986 .

[21]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[22]  Fred L. Kitchens,et al.  Web Services Architecture for M-Learning. , 2004 .

[23]  D. Papineau,et al.  Participatory evaluation in a community organization: Fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization , 1996 .

[24]  L. Degner,et al.  Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review. , 2006, Journal of Advanced Nursing.

[25]  Lynne Callaghan,et al.  Understanding the information and resource needs of UK health and social care placement students. , 2008, Health information and libraries journal.

[26]  Marc Prensky,et al.  What Can You Learn from a Cell Phone? Almost Anything!. , 2005 .

[27]  Christian Dalsgaard.  Pedagogical quality in e-learning - Designing e-learning from a learning theoretical approach , 2005 .