Ex-vivo human pancreatic specimen evaluation by 7 Tesla MRI: a prospective radiological-pathological correlation study

[1]  U. Boggi,et al.  7-T MRI of explanted liver and ex-vivo pancreatic specimens: prospective study protocol of radiological-pathological correlation feasibility (the EXLIPSE project) , 2020, European Radiology Experimental.

[2]  C. Prieto,et al.  Multi‐parametric liver tissue characterization using MR fingerprinting: Simultaneous T1, T2, T2*, and fat fraction mapping , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  U. Boggi,et al.  3 T MR perfusion of solid pancreatic lesions using dynamic contrast-enhanced DISCO sequence: Usefulness of qualitative and quantitative analyses in a pilot study. , 2019, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  I. B. Borel Rinkes,et al.  The diagnostic performance of CT versus FDG PET-CT for the detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[5]  T. Metens,et al.  Assessment of response to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Comparison between diffusion-weighted MR quantitative parameters and RECIST. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[6]  R. Grimm,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: reliability and usefulness for characterization , 2018, Abdominal Radiology.

[7]  J. Kleeff,et al.  Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives , 2018, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

[8]  Fiona Campbell,et al.  PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. , 2018, Health technology assessment.

[9]  Wolfgang Bogner,et al.  Clinical applications at ultrahigh field (7  T). Where does it make the difference? , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[10]  Yong Chen,et al.  MR Fingerprinting for Rapid Quantitative Abdominal Imaging. , 2016, Radiology.

[11]  Stefan Maderwald,et al.  Non-Enhanced MR Imaging of Cerebral Aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  M. Tosetti,et al.  Electromagnetic characterization of an MR volume coil with multilayered cylindrical load using a 2-D analytical approach. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[13]  J. Duerk,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting , 2013, Nature.

[14]  Wolfgang Bogner,et al.  Advanced MR methods at ultra-high field (7 Tesla) for clinical musculoskeletal applications , 2012, European Radiology.

[15]  J. Kench,et al.  Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index , 2012, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[16]  M. Bilodeau,et al.  Identification of new donor variables associated with graft survival in a single‐center liver transplant cohort , 2010, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[17]  M. Schlamann,et al.  First Clinical Study on Ultra-High-Field MR Imaging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of 1.5T and 7T , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[18]  Peter Andersen,et al.  Whole‐body imaging at 7T: Preliminary results , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  N. Dubrawsky.  Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.