The effect of metallic radial head arthroplasty on radiocapitellar joint contact area.

OBJECTIVE This study determined the effect of metallic radial head arthroplasty on radiocapitellar joint contact area. DESIGN The contact area of eight intact radiocapitellar joints was assessed during simulated compressive loading. Subsequently, the same experiments were repeated after reconstruction with three different radial head implant sizes. BACKGROUND There has been an increasing use of metal radial head implants relative to silicone implants. However, the contact characteristics with the metal reconstruction have not been determined. METHODS A 100 N compressive load was applied to the radiocapitellar joint at three different flexion angles for the native joint and three different sizes of a metal head implant. An impression material was employed to quantify joint contact area. RESULTS Following metallic radial head arthroplasty, the contact area decreased by approximately two-thirds relative to the native radiocapitellar joint (P<0.001). Smaller implant sizes resulted in slightly larger contact areas (P<0.05). In addition, contact area decreased as joint flexion angle increased (P<0.04). CONCLUSIONS Selection of radial head implant size is likely not a significant factor with regard to contact area mechanics of the radiocapitellar articulation. RELEVANCE The effect of radial head implant size on the contact area produced with the native capitellum is not known. This study shows that the design or selection of a metallic radial head implant from the viewpoint of size is likely not an important factor with regard to minimizing joint contact stresses.

[1]  K N An,et al.  Elbow joint contact study: comparison of techniques. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  W. Engber,et al.  Reactive synovitis from particulate silastic. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A A Amis,et al.  Primary replacement of the fractured radial head with a metal prosthesis. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  Equipment,et al.  Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Materials: A Status Report , 1990 .

[5]  I. Harrington,et al.  The functional outcome with metallic radial head implants in the treatment of unstable elbow fractures: a long-term review. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  E. Chao,et al.  Silastic prosthetic replacement for the radial head. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  B. Morrey,et al.  Inflammatory arthritis after failure of silicone rubber replacement of the radial head. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  V K Goel,et al.  Contact areas in human elbow joints. , 1982, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  R. H. Fitzgerald,et al.  Total joint arthroplasty. The knee. , 1979, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  J. Macdermid,et al.  Arthroplasty with a Metal Radial Head for Unreconstructible Fractures of the Radial Head , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  B. Morrey,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of the elbow following radial head fracture. Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs. excision, silastic replacement, and non-operative management. , 1998, Chirurgie de la main.

[12]  K. Furry,et al.  Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Arthroplasty versus internal fixation. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  A. Caputo,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of reversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. , 1997, Journal of the American Dental Association.