Assessing Teacher's Discourse Effect on Students' Learning: A Keyword Centrality Approach

The way that content-related keywords co-occur along a lesson seems to play an important role in concept understanding and, therefore, in students’ performance. Thus, network-like structures have been used to represent and summarize conceptual knowledge, particularly in science areas. Previous work has automated the process of producing concept networks, computed different properties of these networks, and studied the correlation of these properties with students’ achievement. This work presents an automated analysis of teachers’ concept graphs, the distribution of relevance amongst content-related keywords and how this affects students’ achievement. Particularly, we automatically extracted concept networks from transcriptions of 25 physics classes with 327 students and compute three centrality measures (CMs): PageRank, Diffusion centrality, and Katz centrality. Next, we study the relation between CMs and students’ performance using multilevel analysis. Results show that PageRank and Katz centrality significantly explain around 75% of the variance between different classes. Furthermore, the overall explained variance increased from 16% to 22% when including keyword centralities of teacher’s discourse as class-level variables. This paper shows a useful, low-cost tool for teachers to analyze and learn about how they orchestrate content-related keywords along with their speech.

[1]  I. Koponen,et al.  Coherent Knowledge Structures of Physics Represented as Concept Networks in Teacher Education , 2010 .

[2]  Tzone-I Wang,et al.  Construction and analysis of educational assessments using knowledge maps with weight appraisal of concepts , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Selcuk R. Sirin Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research , 2005 .

[4]  Arun G. Chandrasekhar,et al.  The Diffusion of Microfinance , 2012, Science.

[5]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[6]  R. Ewijk The effect of peer socioeconomic status on achievement: a meta-analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Peter Sleegers,et al.  The Effect of Peer Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[8]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[9]  H. Schielzeth,et al.  The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded , 2016, bioRxiv.

[10]  P. Labudde Quality of Instruction in Physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland , 2014 .

[11]  Rupert G. Miller The jackknife-a review , 1974 .

[12]  Jocelyn E. Bolin,et al.  Multilevel Modeling Using R , 2019 .

[13]  P. Scott,et al.  Pedagogical link‐making: a fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge , 2011 .

[14]  Knut Neumann,et al.  What Makes the Finnish Different in Science? Assessing and Comparing Students' Science Learning in Three Countries , 2014 .

[15]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[16]  Jianxia Du,et al.  Factors Affecting Online Groupwork Interest: A Multilevel Analysis , 2013 .

[17]  Jing Liu,et al.  Measuring Teaching Practices at Scale: A Novel Application of Text-as-Data Methods , 2021, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.

[18]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .