Prospective randomised study to evaluate effectiveness of distal embolic protection compared to abciximab administration in reduction of microembolic complications of primary coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND Myocardial reperfusion following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is limited due to, among other things, microembolic events. Abciximab and a mechanical system of distal protection both reduce their incidence during PCI. AIM Prospective, randomised study to compare effectiveness of abciximab and protection devices in reduction of microembolic complications during pPCI. METHODS One hundred and twenty consecutive patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction referred for pPCI after coronary angiography were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group A (n=63), treated with abciximab; and Group B (n=57), treated using the distal protection system. Primary endpoint was blood flow through the infarct-related artery (IRA) using TIMI grading after pPCI; secondary endpoints included myocardial perfusion assessment using myocardial blush grade (MBG), ST resolution and improvement of echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after pPCI. RESULTS TIMI grade 3 flow after pPCI was obtained in 89% of patients in both groups, TIMI grade 2 flow in 5% (NS). Myocardial perfusion after pPCI assessed with MBG scored 3 in 66% of patients in group A and 62% of patients in group B (NS). ST resolution was present in 62% (26-84) in group A and 68% (41 - 86) in group B (NS). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant influence of selected variables on the primary endpoint. Analysis performed in the distal protection group revealed significant effects on the following factors on the final TIMI flow in IRA: presence of thrombus prior to pPCI (p=0.026), presence of residual thrombus after aspiration (p <0.001), and IRA diameter of > or =3.5 mm (p=0.01). Median LVEF in group A at sixth month of follow-up was 46% (44-50%), similar to group B - 46% (45-49%) (NS). CONCLUSIONS Use of the PercuSurge distal protection device during pPCI allows angiographic and electrocardiographic measures of reperfusion to be improved. It has a similar effect on left ventricular systolic function as administration of abciximab. The device seems to be useful in patients with culprit artery diameter of > or =3.0 mm, and optimally > or =3.5 mm and thrombus visible on angiography. Successful initial thrombectomy prior to deployment of stent seems particularly important when using the PercuSurge system.

[1]  A. Investigators Three-year duration of benefit from abciximab in patients receiving stents for acute myocardial infarction in the randomized double-blind ADMIRAL study. , 2005, European heart journal.

[2]  F. Neumann,et al.  Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Filter-Based Distal Protection on Myocardial Perfusion and Infarct Size After Primary Percutaneous Catheter Intervention in Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation , 2005, Circulation.

[3]  M. Hori,et al.  Distal Protection Improved Reperfusion and Reduced Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Had Angioscopically Defined Ruptured Plaque , 2005, Circulation.

[4]  C. Di Mario,et al.  X-sizer for thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction improves ST-segment resolution: results of the X-sizer in AMI for negligible embolization and optimal ST resolution (X AMINE ST) trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  H. Kao,et al.  Initial thrombosuction with subsequent angioplasty in primary coronary intervention--comparison with conventional strategy. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Distal Microcirculatory Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2005 .

[7]  S. Oshima,et al.  Effectiveness of distal protection with the GuardWire Plus during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2005, Journal of cardiology.

[8]  H. Yip,et al.  Six‐month angiographic results of primary angioplasty with adjunctive PercuSurge GuardWire device support: Evaluation of the restenotic rate of the target lesion and the fate of the distal balloon occlusion site , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  G. Schuler,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of the Proxis system in demonstrating retrograde coronary blood flow during proximal occlusion and in capturing embolic material. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Comparison of temporary occlusion and aspiration system versus the conventional method during coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  A. Angelini,et al.  Distal Protection With a Filter Device During Coronary Stenting in Patients With Stable and Unstable Angina , 2004, Circulation.

[12]  M. Kawakami,et al.  Effects of a distal protection device during primary stenting in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. , 2004, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[13]  Albert Schömig,et al.  Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. , 2004, Circulation.

[14]  G. Parodi,et al.  Impact of Microvascular Dysfunction on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  J. J. Griffin,et al.  Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial , 2003, Circulation.

[16]  G. Fontanini,et al.  Mechanical Prevention of Distal Embolization During Primary Angioplasty: Safety, Feasibility, and Impact on Myocardial Reperfusion , 2003, Circulation.

[17]  Felix Zijlstra,et al.  Angiographic Assessment of Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction by Myocardial Blush Grade , 2003, Circulation.

[18]  J. Boura,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2003, The Lancet.

[19]  R. Califf,et al.  Effect of abciximab on angiographic complications during percutaneous coronary stenting in the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting Trial (EPISTENT). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, European heart journal.

[21]  M. Leon,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Distal Embolic Protection Device During Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts , 2002, Circulation.

[22]  R. Kloner,et al.  No-reflow phenomenon. , 2002, Circulation.

[23]  M. Morice,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  G. Musumeci,et al.  Effects of abciximab on microvascular integrity and left ventricular functional recovery in patients with acute infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty. , 2003, European heart journal.

[25]  E. Falk,et al.  Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2003, European heart journal.