DUAL TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOTSWANA AGRICULTURE: A STOCHASTIC INPUT DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH / доклад на 25 конференции IAAE, Reshaping Agriculture’s Contribution to Society, International Convention Centre, Durban, South Africa, 16-23 August 2003

To improve the welfare of the rural poor and keep them in the countryside, the government has been spending 40% of the value of agricultural GDP on agricultural support services. But can investment make smallholder agriculture prosperous in such adverse conditions? This paper derives an answer by applying a two-output six-input stochastic translog distance function, with inefficiency effects and biased technical change to panel data for the 18 districts and the commercial sector, from 1979 to 1996. This model demonstrates that herds are the most important input, followed by draft power, land and seeds. Multilateral indices for technical change, technical efficiency and total factor productivity (TFP) show that the technology level of the commercial sector is more than six times that of traditional agriculture and that the gap has been increasing, due to technological regression in traditional agriculture and modest progress in the commercial sector. Since the levels of efficiency are similar, the same pattern is repeated by the TFP indices. This result highlights the policy dilemma of the trade-off between efficiency and equity objectives.

[1]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[2]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  Colin Thirtle,et al.  A stochastic frontier approach to total factor productivity measurement in Bangladesh crop agriculture, 19611992 , 2014 .

[4]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[5]  T. Coelli,et al.  Efficiency measurement, multiple-output technologies and distance functions: with application to European Railways , 2000 .

[6]  C. Lovell,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter , 2000 .

[7]  Tebogo Bruce Seleka.  The performance of Botswana's traditional arable agriculture: growth rates and the impact of the accelerated rainfed arable programme (ARAP) , 1999 .

[8]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  Estimating output substitutability of hospital services: A distance function approach , 1995 .

[9]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[10]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality , 1986 .

[11]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[12]  Atakelty Hailu,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Analysis of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1959-1994: An Input Distance Function Approach , 2000 .

[13]  J. Mbaiwa,et al.  Globalisation and the Livestock Industry in Botswana , 2002 .

[14]  H. Kim.  The Antonelli Versus Hicks Elasticity of Complementarity and Inverse Input Demand Systems , 2000 .

[15]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[16]  Catherine J. Morrison Paul,et al.  Efficiency in New Zealand Sheep and Beef Farming: The Impacts of Regulatory Reform , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[17]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach , 1988 .

[18]  R. Perrin,et al.  Agricultural productivity in developing countries , 1998 .

[19]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[20]  Testing for Behavioral Objective and Aggregation Opportunities in U.S. Agricultural Data , 1998 .

[21]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach , 2000 .

[22]  Tebogo Bruce Seleka.  Determinants of short-run supply of small ruminants in Botswana. , 2001, Small ruminant research : the journal of the International Goat Association.

[23]  Thomas Glauben,et al.  Decomposition of Productivity Growth Using Distance Functions: The Case of Dairy Farms in Three European Countries , 2002 .

[24]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[25]  C. Lovell,et al.  RESOURCES AND FUNCTIONINGS: A NEW VIEW OF INEQUALITY IN AUSTRALIA , 1994 .