Natural Perspective: Mapping Visual Space with Art and Science

Following its discovery in fifteenth-century Italy, linear perspective has often been hailed as the most accurate method of projecting three-dimensional visual space onto a two-dimensional picture plane. However, when we survey the history of European art it is evident that few artists fully complied with its mathematical rules, despite many of them being rigorously trained in its procedures. In this paper, we will consider how artists have actually depicted visual space, and present evidence that images created according to a “natural” perspective (NP) used by artists are judged as better representations of visual space than those created using standard linear (LP) and curvilinear fisheye (FP) projective geometries. In this study, we built a real three-dimensional scene and produced photographs of the scene in three different perspectives (NP, LP and FP). An online experiment in which we asked people to rank the perspectives in order of preference showed a clear preference for NP compared to the FP and LP. In a second experiment, participants were asked to view the real scene and rate each perspective on a range of psychological variables. Results showed that NP was the most preferred and the most effective in depicting the physical space naturally. We discuss the implications of these results and the advantages and limitations of our approach for studying the global metric and geometrical structure of visual space.

[1]  Samuel Y. Edgerton The Renaissance rediscovery of linear perspective , 1975 .

[2]  Jessica Schulze Cezannes Composition Analysis Of His Form With Diagrams And Photographs Of His Motifs , 2016 .

[3]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Scene perception from central to peripheral vision. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[5]  S Anstis,et al.  Picturing Peripheral Acuity , 1998, Perception.

[6]  Emily A. Cooper,et al.  Camera Focal Length and the Perception of Pictures , 2014, Ecological psychology : a publication of the International Society for Ecological Psychology.

[7]  Peiyi Shen,et al.  RTcams: A New Perspective on Nonphotorealistic Rendering from Photographs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  R. Pepperell Always Learning to See: The Art and Thought of Sargy Mann , 2016 .

[9]  Francesca C. Fortenbaugh,et al.  Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[10]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[11]  Nelson Goodman,et al.  Languages of Art, an Approach to a Theory of Symbols , 1970 .

[12]  R. Pepperell Egocentric Perspective: Depicting the Body from Its Own Point of View , 2015, Leonardo.

[13]  The adventures of the optic nerve , 2004 .

[14]  Robert Pepperell,et al.  Comparing artistic and geometrical perspective depictions of space in the visual field , 2014, i-Perception.

[15]  J. Elkins The Poetics of Perspective , 1994 .

[16]  Vision and the Technique of Art , 1923 .

[17]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Wide distribution of external local sign in the normal population , 2009, Psychological research.

[18]  Olivier Penacchio,et al.  Visual discomfort and the spatial distribution of Fourier energy , 2015, Vision Research.

[19]  G. Doesschate,et al.  Perspective : fundamentals, controversials, history , 1964 .

[20]  J. Mateer On the Painting , 2011 .

[21]  Jessika Weiss,et al.  Vision Science Photons To Phenomenology , 2016 .

[22]  J M Foley,et al.  The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. , 1972, Vision research.

[23]  M. Goulding,et al.  Erratum: Lbx1 and Tlx3 are opposing switches in determining GABAergic versus glutamatergic transmitter phenotypes , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space , 2000, Perception.

[25]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Emotional Valence Modulates the Preference for Curved Objects , 2011, Perception.

[26]  Paul Cézanne,et al.  Cezanne: Landscape into Art , 1996 .

[27]  R. Hetherington The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[28]  C. Erkelens Equidistant Intervals in Perspective Photographs and Paintings , 2016, i-Perception.

[29]  R. Pepperell,et al.  Double Vision as a Pictorial Depth Cue , 2013 .

[30]  Joseph Baldwin,et al.  Can artistic methods be used to improve the perception of depth in pictures?: an investigation into two methods , 2015 .

[31]  James E. Sheedy,et al.  The Effects of Visual Display Distance on Eye Accommodation, Head Posture, and Vision and Neck Symptoms , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[32]  C. Tyler The Vault of Perception: Are Straight Lines Seen as Curved? , 2015 .

[33]  Robert Hansen,et al.  Curvilinear Perspective: From Visual Space to the Constructed Image , 1989 .

[34]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky , 2009, Psychological science.

[35]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Basic Vision: An Introduction to Visual Perception , 2006 .

[36]  S. Gilman,et al.  The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci , 1978, Medical History.

[37]  James J. Gibson,et al.  The Information Available in Pictures , 1971 .

[38]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  The Structure of Visual Spaces , 2008, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[39]  Robert Pepperell,et al.  The perception of art and the science of perception , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[40]  Christain Binder The Geometry of an Art, The History of the Mathematical Theory of Perspective from Alberti to Monge. Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences , 2012 .

[41]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Exocentric pointing in the visual field , 2013, i-Perception.

[42]  S. Freguia Researches in Binocular Vision. , 1950 .

[43]  L CHARNWOOD,et al.  Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. , 1948, The Optician.

[44]  Tomas Akenine-Möller,et al.  Comparison of projection methods for rendering virtual reality , 2016, High Performance Graphics.

[45]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  The Geometry of Visual Space: About the Incompatibility between Science and Mathematics , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[46]  M. Wagner,et al.  The geometries of visual space , 2006 .

[47]  The Artistic and Scientific Collaboration of Blanche Ames Ames and Adelbert Arnes II , 2017 .

[48]  R. Hansen This Curving World: Hyperbolic Linear Perspective , 1973 .

[49]  F. A. Miles Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[50]  A. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Humans Ignore Motion and Stereo Cues in Favor of a Fictional Stable World , 2006, Current Biology.

[51]  Martin Kemp,et al.  The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat by Martin Kemp (review) , 1991, Technology and Culture.

[52]  B. Rauschenbach Perceptual Perspective and Cezanne’s Landscapes , 1982 .

[53]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[54]  E. Panofsky Perspective as symbolic form , 1991 .

[55]  Dale Purves,et al.  A statistical explanation of visual space , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Jewel H. Conover,et al.  The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci , 1962 .

[57]  Ernst Gombrich,et al.  The Story of Art , 1950 .

[58]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses , 2015, PloS one.

[59]  William R. Huggard OCULAR ACCOMMODATION AND THE APPARENT SIZE OF OBJECTS , 1903 .

[60]  James L. Park,et al.  Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science , 2023 .

[61]  Guido Hauck Die Subjektive Perspektive und die Horizontalen Curvaturen des Dorischen Styls , 1879 .

[62]  S. Shulman,et al.  A fresh perspective. , 2013, Pediatric annals.

[63]  W. D. Wright Optics Painting and Photography , 1971 .

[64]  Robert French Apparent Distortions in Photography and the Geometry of Visual Space , 2016 .

[65]  Daniel M. Germán,et al.  Pannini: A New Projection for RenderingWide Angle Perspective Images , 2010, CAe.

[66]  Karan Singh,et al.  Ryan: rendering your animation nonlinearly projected , 2004, NPAR '04.

[67]  R. Pepperell,et al.  Do Artists Use Linear Perspective to Depict Visual Space? , 2014, Perception.

[68]  P. Suppes Some Foundational Problems in the Theory of Visual Space , 2022 .

[69]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[70]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Metamers of the ventral stream , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[71]  Maria Beatriz Carmo,et al.  Interactive visualizer for the extended perspective system as support for architectural design , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (GRAPP).

[72]  Olivier Penacchio,et al.  Discomfort from urban scenes : metabolic consequences , 2017 .

[73]  James L. Park,et al.  Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science , 1983 .

[74]  Dejan Todorović,et al.  Is Pictorial Perception Robust? The Effect of the Observer Vantage Point on the Perceived Depth Structure of Linear-Perspective Images , 2008, Perception.

[75]  諒三 吉野,et al.  印東太郎 著『The Global Structure of Visual Space』 , 2005 .

[76]  Luisa Doldi,et al.  The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft , 2007 .

[77]  R. MELDOLA,et al.  The Optics of Photography , 1894, Nature.

[78]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..