Safety climate and its relationship with furniture companies’ safety performance and workers’ risk acceptance

This study aims to analyse the relationship between safety climate and the level of risk acceptance, as well as its relationship with workplace safety performance. The sample includes 14 companies and 403 workers. The safety climate assessment was performed by the application of a Safety Climate in Wood Industries questionnaire and safety performance was assessed with a checklist. Judgements about risk acceptance were measured through questionnaires together with four other variables: trust, risk perception, benefit perception and emotion. Safety climate was found to be correlated with workgroup safety performance, and it also plays an important role in workers’ risk acceptance levels. Risk acceptance tends to be lower when safety climate scores of workgroups are high, and subsequently, their safety performance is better. These findings seem to be relevant, as they provide Occupational, Safety and Health practitioners with a better understanding of workers’ risk acceptance levels and of the differences among workgroups.

[1]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[2]  F. Guldenmund.  The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[3]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  A longitudinal study of safety climate on the Norwegian continental shelf. , 2008 .

[4]  Pedro M Arezes,et al.  Multilevel model of safety climate for furniture industries. , 2015, Work.

[5]  N. Bronfman,et al.  Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources , 2012 .

[6]  S. Roeser.  The role of emotions in judging the moral acceptability of risks , 2006 .

[7]  U Varonen,et al.  The safety climate and its relationship to safety practices, safety of the work environment and occupational accidents in eight wood-processing companies. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro , 2000 .

[9]  Pablo Arocena,et al.  The Impact of Prevention Measures and Organisational Factors on Occupational Injuries , 2008 .

[10]  Bente E. Moen,et al.  What is most important for safety climate: The company belonging or the local working environment? – A study from the Norwegian offshore industry , 2009 .

[11]  K. Mearns,et al.  Perspectives on safety: The impact of group membership, work factors and trust on safety performance in UK and Norwegian drilling company employees , 2010 .

[12]  Frank W. Guldenmund,et al.  The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation , 2007 .

[13]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Dongping Fang,et al.  The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art , 2007 .

[15]  Jun Bi,et al.  The influence of public perception on risk acceptance of the chemical industry and the assistance for risk communication , 2013 .

[16]  M. Bhasi,et al.  Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry. , 2009 .

[17]  Kent Jacob Nielsen,et al.  Changes in safety climate and accidents at two identical manufacturing plants , 2008 .

[18]  Sakari Kuikka,et al.  Risk identification and perception in the fisheries sector: Comparisons between the Faroes, Greece, Iceland and UK , 2010 .

[19]  D. R. Kouabénan,et al.  Role of beliefs in accident and risk analysis and prevention , 2009 .

[20]  M D Cooper,et al.  Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[21]  Zengwei Yuan,et al.  Analysis of Determining Factors of the Public's Risk Acceptance Level in China , 2010 .

[22]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[23]  Gil Luria,et al.  The social aspects of safety management: trust and safety climate. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Chin-Shan Lu,et al.  Safety climate and safety behavior in the passenger ferry context. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Relationships between safety climate and safety performance of building repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition (RMAA) works , 2014 .

[26]  Peter Y Chen,et al.  Roles of safety climate and shift work on perceived injury risk: a multi-level analysis. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  S. A. Silva,et al.  Another look at safety climate and safety behavior: deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Stephen E. Johnson,et al.  The predictive validity of safety climate. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[29]  Stian Antonsen,et al.  The relationship between culture and safety on offshore supply vessels. , 2009 .

[30]  Ming Ji,et al.  The impact of risk tolerance, risk perception and hazardous attitude on safety operation among airline pilots in China , 2011 .

[31]  Sharon Clarke,et al.  Human Safety and Risk Management, Second Edition , 2006 .

[32]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Charles Reese,et al.  Accident/incident prevention techniques , 2001 .

[34]  Marianne Törner,et al.  Causal relations between psychosocial conditions, safety climate and safety behaviour - A multi-level investigation , 2013 .

[35]  D. R. Kouabenan.  Beliefs and the Perception of Risks and Accidents , 1998 .

[36]  Nicolás C. Bronfman,et al.  An empirical study for the direct and indirect links between trust in regulatory institutions and acceptability of hazards , 2009 .

[37]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  Markus Schöbel,et al.  Empowering team leadership and safety performance in nuclear power plants: A multilevel approach , 2013 .

[39]  Virna Vaneza Gutiérrez,et al.  Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile , 2008 .

[40]  A. Glendon,et al.  Human Safety and Risk Management, Second Edition , 2006 .

[41]  Margherita Pasini,et al.  Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: co-workers as the missing link , 2012 .

[42]  Zohar Dov,et al.  Safety Climate and Beyond: A Multi-Level Multi-Climate Framework , 2008 .

[43]  Margherita Pasini,et al.  Development and validation of an Integrated Organizational Safety Climate Questionnaire with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis , 2011, Quality & Quantity.

[45]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology1 , 1999 .

[46]  Carl Rollenhagen,et al.  Professional subcultures in nuclear power plants , 2013 .

[47]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[48]  Andrew Weyman,et al.  Risk, Trust, and Safety Culture in U.K. Train Operating Companies , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[49]  Celina Pinto Leão,et al.  Risk Acceptance in the Furniture Sector: Analysis of Acceptance Level and Relevant Influence Factors , 2015 .

[50]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆ , 2000 .

[51]  S. Clarke.  Contrasting perceptual, attitudinal and dispositional approaches to accident involvement in the workplace , 2006 .