Thermal environment assessment reliability using temperature--humidity indices.

A reliable assessment of the thermal environment should take into account the whole of the six parameters affecting the thermal sensation (air temperature, air velocity, humidity, mean radiant temperature, metabolic rate and thermo-physical properties of clothing). Anyway, the need of a quick evaluation based on few measurements and calculations has leaded to like best temperature-humidity indices instead of rational methods based on the heat balance on the human body. Among these, Canadian Humidex, preliminarily used only for weather forecasts, is becoming more and more widespread for a generalized assessment of both outdoor and indoor thermal environments. This custom arouses great controversies since using an index validated in outdoor conditions does not assure its indoor reliability. Moreover is it really possible to carry out the thermal environment assessment ignoring some of variables involved in the physiological response of the human body? Aiming to give a clear answer to these questions, this paper deals with a comparison between the assessment carried out according to the rational methods suggested by International Standards in force and the Humidex index. This combined analysis under hot stress situations (indoor and outdoor) has been preliminarily carried out; in a second phase the study deals with the indoor comfort prediction. Obtained results show that Humidex index very often leads to the underestimation of the workplace dangerousness and a poor reliability of comfort prediction when it is used in indoor situations.

[1]  P. Fanger.  Moderate Thermal Environments Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort , 1984 .

[2]  Boris Igor Palella,et al.  The Role Of Measurement Accuracy OnThe Heat Stress Assessment According ToISO 7933: 2004 , 2007 .

[3]  Luigi Perini,et al.  Epidemiologic study of mortality during the Summer 2003 heat wave in Italy. , 2005, Environmental research.

[4]  A. P. Gagge,et al.  An Effective Temperature Scale Based on a Simple Model of Human Physiological Regulatiry Response , 1972 .

[5]  Austin Henschel,et al.  EVALUATION OF THERMAL ENVIRONMENT IN SHELTERS , 1963 .

[6]  John W. Pepi.  The Summer Simmer Index , 1987 .

[7]  R. Steadman.  The Assessment of Sultriness. Part I: A Temperature-Humidity Index Based on Human Physiology and Clothing Science , 1979 .

[8]  W R Santee,et al.  Use of Humidex to Set Thermal Work Limits for Emergency Workers in Protective Clothing , 2005 .

[9]  K. Scharlau.  Zur Einführung eines Schwülemass-Stabes und Abgrenzung von Schwülezonen durch Isohygrothermen , 1950 .

[10]  E. C. Thom.  The Discomfort Index , 1959 .

[11]  K. Lomas,et al.  Computer prediction of human thermoregulatory and temperature responses to a wide range of environmental conditions , 2001, International journal of biometeorology.

[12]  N. E. Manos.  Discomfort Index. , 1959, Science.

[13]  H. S. Belding,et al.  Index for evaluating Heat Stress in Terms of resulting Physiological Strains. , 1955 .

[14]  P. Höppe,et al.  The physiological equivalent temperature – a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment , 1999, International journal of biometeorology.

[15]  D. H. Lee.  Seventy-five years of searching for a heat index. , 1980, Environmental research.

[16]  Baruch Givoni,et al.  Man climate and architecture , 1969 .

[17]  P. Höppe.  Indoor climate , 2005, Experientia.

[18]  G Havenith,et al.  Development and validation of the predicted heat strain model. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[19]  William R. Santee,et al.  Comparison of weather service heat indices using a thermal model , 2005 .

[20]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .