How to Summarize Single-Participant Research: Ideas and Applications

This article describes the need for systematic methods for summarizing single-participant research, describes various approaches for quantitative synthesis, and reviews conclusions of completed synthesis efforts. There is general, but not universal, agreement for the need for systematic literature-review procedures. Areas of disagreement center around the issue of whether outcomes of single-participant research studies can be represented by a single common metric and, if so, which metric is the most useful. Although several alternatives are reviewed, we recommend the use of the percentage of nonoverlapping data metric, and we describe several instances in which it has been employed effectively.

[1]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Early Intervention for Children with Conduct Disorders: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1986 .

[2]  W M Baum,et al.  Time allocation in human vigilance. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[4]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Reply to Owen White , 1987 .

[5]  J L Matson,et al.  A review of treatment research for self-injurious and stereotyped responding. , 2008, Journal of mental deficiency research.

[6]  K. Corcoran Aggregating the idiographic data of single-subject research , 1985 .

[7]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Summarizing Single-Subject Research , 1998, Behavior modification.

[8]  James M. Kauffman,et al.  Problems in Logic and Interpretation with Quantitative Syntheses of Single-Case Research: Mathur and Colleagues (1998) as a Case in Point , 1998 .

[9]  Barbara J. Smith,et al.  A Counter-Interpretation of Early Intervention Effects: A Response to Casto and Mastropieri , 1986 .

[10]  F. Gresham Social Skills Training: Should We Raze, Remodel, or Rebuild? , 1998 .

[11]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Social Skills Interventions with Students with Emotional and Behavioral Problems: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1998 .

[12]  R. R. Jones,et al.  Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  Bradley E. Huitema,et al.  Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. , 1985 .

[14]  B. S. Parsonson,et al.  2 – The Analysis and Presentation of Graphic Data , 1978 .

[15]  O. White,et al.  Some Comments Concerning “The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research” , 1987 .

[16]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Methods for Integrative Reviews , 1980 .

[17]  C. Sachse-Lee,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Single-Subject-Design Intervention Research for Students with LD , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  T. Scruggs,et al.  The utility of the PND statistic: a reply to Allison and Gorman. , 1994, Behaviour research and therapy.

[19]  John M. Gottman,et al.  4 – Analysis of Interrupted Time-Series Experiments , 1978 .

[20]  T S Critchfield,et al.  Quantitative integration of single-subject studies: Methods and misinterpretations , 1999, The Behavior analyst.

[21]  A. Kazdin,et al.  Methodological and interpretive problems of single-case experimental designs. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  T. Sajwaj,et al.  Adverse effects of differential parental attention. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[23]  S. R. Mathur,et al.  Right Reason in the Integration of Group and Single-Subject Research in Behavioral Disorders , 2000 .

[24]  Ronald D. Franklin,et al.  Antecedent Exercise in the Treatment of Disruptive Behavior: A Meta‐Analytic Review , 1995 .

[25]  D M Baer,et al.  An implicit technology of generalization. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[26]  R. Rutherford,et al.  Generalization and Maintenance of Treatment Effects , 1988 .

[27]  A. Baron,et al.  Human sensitivity to reinforcement: A comment on Kollins, Newland, and Critchfield’s (1997) quantitative literature review , 1999, The Behavior analyst.

[28]  S. Kollins,et al.  Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter? , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Friedrich Lösel,et al.  Effects of training social competence in children: A meta-analysis of recent evaluation studies , 1994 .

[30]  M. Mastropieri,et al.  The Efficacy of Early Intervention Programs: A Meta-Analysis , 1986, Exceptional children.

[31]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: treatment validity and standards of practice. , 1991, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[32]  A. Deprospero,et al.  Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[33]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[34]  R. Rosenthal Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[35]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Early Intervention for Developmental Functioning: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1988 .

[36]  Kenneth A. Kavale,et al.  Early Language Intervention , 1988 .

[37]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[38]  Ann Casey,et al.  A Methodology for the Quantitative Synthesis of Intra-Subject Design Research , 1985 .

[39]  B. Gorman,et al.  Calculating effect sizes for meta-analysis: the case of the single case. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[40]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Constructing more meaningful relationships: Mnemonic instruction for special populations , 1989 .

[41]  Bernard S. Gorman,et al.  “Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler.” A rejoinder to Scruggs and Mastropieri , 1994 .

[42]  Donald M. Baer,et al.  Meta-analysis for Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[43]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Why Social Skills Training Doesn’t Work: An Alternative Model , 1990 .

[44]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Early Intervention for Socially Withdrawn Children , 1985 .

[45]  R. Wahler Oppositional children: a quest for parental reinforcement control. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[46]  Wallace J. Gingerich Meta-Analysis of Applied Time-Series Data , 1984 .

[47]  Donald M. Baer,et al.  The Graphic Analysis of Data , 1986 .

[48]  Ann Casey,et al.  Nonaversive Procedures in the Treatment of Classroom Behavior Problems , 1985 .

[49]  D. Gast,et al.  Single Subject Research in Special Education , 1984 .

[50]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes , 1999 .

[51]  J. Levin,et al.  Single-case research design and analysis : new directions for psychology and education , 1992 .

[52]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Response to Salzberg, Strain, and Baer , 1987 .