Bridging Social Constraint and Social Action to Design Organizations for Innovation

Organization studies offers conflicting design ideas to organize large firms in mature industries for sustained product innovation. These conflicts arise in part from the bifurcation in theory between social constraint and social action, even though structuration views emphasize that neither exists without the other. Designs based on social constraint emphasize boundaries, authority, and reward mechanisms, while designs based on social action emphasize emergence, knowledgeable action, and self-fulfillment. This analysis applies a design science framework to reveal the incommensurate construction principles in the bifurcated designs. Construction principles are imperative statements for action that bridge organization theory and organization design, and highlight deeper meanings behind design guidelines. The construction principles for innovation evoke different patterns of managerial work, emphasizing either direct managerial agency while constraining employees or indirect shaping and enabling. I develop three alternate construction principles based on the mutual constitution of constraint and action. These principles capture some of the insights of the two separated sets of principles, but also reflect a coherent understanding of social order in organizations and organizing.

[1]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[2]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[3]  César Camisón-Zornoza,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size , 2004 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[5]  Ann Swidler.  CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[6]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[7]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[9]  A. Pearson.  Managing New Product Innovations. , 1989 .

[10]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[11]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[12]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Changes in the Work Environment for Creativity During Downsizing , 1999 .

[13]  Mariann Jelinek,et al.  The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms , 1990 .

[14]  R. Collins.  On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? , 1993 .

[16]  T. Thrall.  Work redesign. , 2003, Hospitals & health networks.

[17]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory , 1996 .

[18]  J. Moran-Ellis.  The ambiguity of play , 1998 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  K. WeiK..  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 2009, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[23]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Product Leadership: Creating And Launching Superior New Products , 1998 .

[24]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[25]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[26]  D. Mowery,et al.  Managing Product Definition in High-Technology Industries: A Pilot Study , 1994 .

[27]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance , 2003 .

[29]  Anne S. Miner.  Idiosyncratic Jobs in Formalized Organizations , 1987 .

[30]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[31]  D. Dougherty.  Managing Your Core Incompetencies for Corporate Venturing , 1995 .

[32]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change , 2003 .

[33]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[34]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Real-world R&D: jumping the product generation gap , 1999 .

[35]  Jeffrey Katz.  Winning Through Innovation , 1997 .

[36]  Linda A. Cyr,et al.  The Human Resource Executive Effect in Initial Public Offering Firms , 1999 .

[37]  Johan Roos,et al.  Towards a new model of strategy-making as serious play , 1999 .

[38]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[40]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[41]  F. Westley.  Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion , 1990 .

[42]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[43]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[44]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[45]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[46]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[47]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[48]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[49]  Michael Schrage,et al.  Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate , 1999 .

[50]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[51]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[52]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution * , 2003 .

[53]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the 21st Century , 2006 .

[54]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[55]  N. DiTomaso.  "Sociological Reductionism" From Parsons to Althusser: Linking Action and Structure in Social Theory , 1982 .

[56]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[57]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Organizing Work by Adaptation , 1991 .

[58]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[59]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Profiles And Critiques In Social Theory , 1982 .

[60]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[61]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[63]  D. Barton.  Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation , 1995 .

[64]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[65]  Boris Magnusson,et al.  Technology integration , 1996, CSUR.

[66]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .