Scenario-based risk assessment of TENORM waste disposal options in oil and gas industry

Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Nuclear Radioactive Materials (TENORM) waste in the petroleum industry has become a serious concern as a potential source of radiation. The risk of being exposed to TENORM waste must be identified and controlled to protect workers, the general public and the environment. This paper presents an analysis of TENORM waste disposal options and risk assessment methods commonly used in the oil and gas industry. To assess their effectiveness, the paper utilizes an integrated fate and transport methodology and exposure pathways. The paper also studies plausible scenarios in which the contaminants can migrate through the geosphere and biosphere, reaching the environment, animals and humans. A real case scenario of TENORM waste disposed in an evaporation pond is simulated using RESRAD (version 6.5) where real data used as input parameters to evaluate the potential radiological doses and increased carcinogenic risk. To both understand and validate the simulated results, the findings of the real case scenario are compared with results obtained using a similar simulated scenario constructed from a literature review.

[1]  Philip Jennings,et al.  An Assessment of the environmental radiation dose for residents of the Perth Metropolitan Area , 1994 .

[2]  R. Al-Fares,et al.  Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials in the oil industry (TENORM). , 2009 .

[3]  Division on Earth.  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[4]  John A. Veil,et al.  Produced water volumes and management practices in the United States. , 2009 .

[5]  A. Al-Farsi.  Radiological aspects of petroleum exploration and production in the sultanate of Oman , 2008 .

[6]  B. Heinmiller,et al.  The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Estimates of Radiation-Related Cancer Risks , 2007, Radiation research.

[7]  G. E. Smith,et al.  Economic Impact of Potential NORM Regulations , 1995 .

[8]  C. Hazin,et al.  Radioactivity concentration in liquid and solid phases of scale and sludge generated in the petroleum industry. , 2005, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[9]  C R Muirhead,et al.  Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  T. Strand.  HANDLING AND DISPOSAL OF NORM IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[11]  M. Wójcik,et al.  Enhanced radioactivity due to natural oil and gas production and related radiological problems. , 1985, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  G J White,et al.  Measurement of 222Rn flux, 222Rn emanation, and 226,228Ra concentration from injection well pipe scale. , 1998, Health physics.

[13]  R S O'Brien,et al.  Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM): pathway analysis and radiological impact. , 1998, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[14]  Icrp.  Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 , 1991 .

[15]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[16]  Yukiko Shimizu,et al.  Effect of Recent Changes in Atomic Bomb Survivor Dosimetry on Cancer Mortality Risk Estimates , 2004, Radiation research.

[17]  Karen P. Smith,et al.  Radiological dose assessment related to management of naturally occurring radioactive materials generated by the petroleum industry , 1995 .

[18]  Megan A. Sharkey,et al.  Remediation of Hazardous Materials with an Emphasis on NORM , 2008 .