‘Am I Still One of Them?’: Bicultural Immigrant Managers Navigating Social Identity Threats When Spanning Global Boundaries

We examine the practice of nominating bicultural immigrants to manage knowledge-intensive projects sourced from their host to their home countries. We focus on their actions vis-a-vis global collaborators and unpack psychological processes involved. Managers in these positions have to navigate the workplace social identity threat that arises from being associated with the home country group – a lower status group in this context. How they navigate this threat shapes the way they use their bicultural competencies and authority as managers. When they embrace their home country identity, immigrant managers tend to enable knowledge-based boundary spanning through actions empowering home country collaborators, such as teaching missing competencies, connecting to important stakeholders, and soliciting input. Instead, when distancing from their home country identity, they tend to hinder collaborators by micromanaging, narrowing communication channels, and suppressing input. We develop theoretical implications for the study of global boundary spanning, bicultural managers, and workplace social identity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Professional Guilds, Tension and Knowledge Management , 2009 .

[2]  R. R. Blake,et al.  Reactions to Intergroup Competition Under Win-Lose Conditions , 1961 .

[3]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing , 2004, CACM.

[4]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[5]  Tsedal B. Neeley,et al.  Language Matters: Status Loss and Achieved Status Distinctions in Global Organizations , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[6]  M. Morley,et al.  Changing patterns of global staffing in the multinational enterprise: Challenges to the conventional expatriate assignment and emerging alternatives , 2007 .

[7]  A. Lewin,et al.  Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent , 2009 .

[8]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[9]  Verónica Benet-Martínez,et al.  Bicultural identity integration (BII): components and psychosocial antecedents. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[10]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The Scaffolding Activities of International Returnee Executives: A Learning Based Perspective of Global Boundary Spanning , 2017 .

[11]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity , 2005 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  Radhika Jain,et al.  Mitigating Vendor Silence in Offshore Outsourcing: An Empirical Investigation , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[15]  Judith A. Holton,et al.  Remodeling Grounded Theory , 2004 .

[16]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Offshore information systems project success: the role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[18]  Elisa Mattarelli,et al.  How Offshore Professionals' Job Dissatisfaction Can Promote Further Offshoring: Organizational Outcomes of Job Crafting , 2015 .

[19]  Amar Gupta,et al.  Offshore-onsite subgroup dynamics in globally distributed teams , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  Dina M. Abdelzaher,et al.  The Boundary Spanning Effects of the Muslim Diaspora on the Internationalization Processes of Firms from Organization of Islamic Conference Countries , 2013 .

[21]  T. Kostova,et al.  Multiculturalism from a cognitive perspective: Patterns and implications , 2014 .

[22]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  How newcomers influence group utilization of their knowledge: Integrating versus differentiating Strategies , 2015 .

[23]  Aimée A. Kane Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[24]  A. Johri,et al.  Boundary spanning knowledge broker: An emerging role in global engineering firms , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[25]  A. Bardhan,et al.  Competitiveness and an Emerging Sector: The Russian Software Industry and its Global Linkages , 2006 .

[26]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Managing Global Innovation: Frameworks for Integrating Capabilities around the World , 2012 .

[27]  Richard D. Harvey,et al.  Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. , 1999 .

[28]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. BOUNDARY SPANNING ACTIVITIES OF CORPORATE HQ EXECUTIVES INSIGHTS FROM A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 2018 .

[29]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  ホン へジョン,et al.  L'Oreal Masters Multiculturalism , 2014 .

[31]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The globalization of high-value activities: Why do firms offshore advanced tasks? , 2010 .

[32]  Martina Musteen,et al.  Offshore outsourcing as a source of international competitiveness for SMEs , 2009 .

[33]  Stacey R. Fitzsimmons Multicultural Employees: A Framework for Understanding How They Contribute to Organizations , 2013 .

[34]  Lucia Piscitello,et al.  Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: : subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes , 2014 .

[35]  Linda Argote,et al.  Superordinate Identity and Knowledge Creation and Transfer in Organizations , 2009 .

[36]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Emergence and Role of Cultural Boundary Spanners in Global Engineering Project Networks , 2010 .

[37]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[38]  Roy J. Eidelson,et al.  Toward a Unifying Model of Identification With Groups: Integrating Theoretical Perspectives , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[39]  Peter D. Ørberg Jensen A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services , 2012 .

[40]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .

[41]  A. Rashel,et al.  Time Frame , 1998, Afterimage.

[42]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[43]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[44]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  The role of international assignees' social capital in creating inter-unit intellectual capital: A cross-level model , 2009 .

[45]  Y. Doz Managing multinational operations: from organisational structures to mental structures and from operations to innovations , 2016 .

[46]  Brian Nicholson Embedded Knowledge and Offshore Software Development , 2007, RE.

[47]  M. Subramani,et al.  Cluster capabilities or ethnic ties? Location choice by foreign and domestic entrants in the services offshoring industry in India , 2009 .

[48]  Y. Doz,et al.  From a distance and detached to up close and personal: Bridging strategic and cross-cultural perspectives in international management research and practice , 2010 .

[49]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  Influence of Role Stress on Industrial Salespeople's Work Outcomes in the United States, Japan and Korea , 1992 .

[50]  D. Minbaeva,et al.  Contextualising the individual in international management research: black boxes, comfort zones and a future research agenda , 2016 .

[51]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Putting the Global in Global Work: An Intercultural Lens on the Practice of Cross-National Collaboration , 2011 .

[52]  R. Mudambi Hierarchy, coordination, and innovation in the multinational enterprise , 2011 .

[53]  Syed Nasirin,et al.  Grounded theory method in information systems research: its nature, diversity and opportunities , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  V. Benet‐Martínez,et al.  Variations in Multicultural Experience : Influence of Bicultural Identity Integration on Socio-Cognitive Processes and Outcomes , 2014 .

[55]  Patricia Faison Hewlin,et al.  SPLINTERED IDENTITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: THE PREDICAMENT OF BOUNDARY SPANNING MANAGERS , 2003 .

[56]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Boundary Capabilities in MNCs: Knowledge Transformation for Creative Solution Development , 2017 .

[57]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Intra‐organizational knowledge exchange , 2009 .

[58]  Verónica Benet-Martínez,et al.  Identity Motives and Cultural Priming: Cultural (Dis)Identification in Assimilative and Contrastive Responses , 2008 .

[59]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[60]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  An Embedded Model of Cultural Adaptation in Global Teams , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[61]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[62]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams , 2013, Journal of International Business Studies.

[63]  Jacqueline K. Mitchelson,et al.  Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions , 2003 .

[64]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations , 2017 .

[65]  N. Ellemers,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS , 2006 .

[66]  Thomas P. Murtha,et al.  INTRODUCTIONOffshoring administrative and technical work: New fields for understanding the global enterprise , 2009 .

[67]  Anca Metiu,et al.  Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Gender-Bias Primes Elicit Queen-Bee Responses Among Senior Policewomen , 2011, Psychological science.

[69]  M. Pratt Fitting Oval Pegs Into Round Holes , 2008 .

[70]  Miriam Moeller,et al.  Improving the probabilities of success of expatriate managers in the global organisation of the 21st century , 2011 .

[71]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[72]  Z. Zhao,et al.  Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge , 2013 .

[73]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Qualitative research for international business , 2011 .

[74]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Identity processes in organizations , 2011 .

[75]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[76]  J. Dawson,et al.  Boundary spanners' identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations , 2006 .

[77]  N. Ellemers The Group Self , 2012, Science.

[78]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Embedded Knowledge and Offshore Software Development , 2004, 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007).

[80]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[81]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  When and how groups utilize dissenting newcomer knowledge: Newcomers’ future prospects condition the effect of language-based identity strategies , 2016 .

[82]  Fiona Lee,et al.  Negotiating Biculturalism , 2002 .

[83]  Mary Yoko Brannen,et al.  When Mickey Loses Face: Recontextualization, Semantic Fit, and the Semiotics of Foreignness , 2004 .

[84]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Intra-organizational knowledge exchange An examination of reverse capability transfer in multinational corporations , 2009 .

[85]  Fiona Lee,et al.  Connecting the Dots Within , 2008, Psychological science.

[86]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  The Bridging Role of Expatriates and Inpatriates in Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations , 2016 .

[87]  Hae-jung Hong,et al.  Bicultural Competence and its Impact on Team Effectiveness , 2010 .

[88]  Ben A. Rissing,et al.  America's New Immigrant Entrepreneurs: Part I , 2007 .

[89]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The Offshoring Challenge: Strategic Design and Innovation for Tomorrow’s Organization , 2013 .

[90]  Markus Venzin,et al.  The Strategic Nexus of Offshoring and Outsourcing Decisions , 2010 .

[91]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  One of Us or One of My Friends: How Social Identity and Tie Strength Shape the Creative Generativity of Boundary-Spanning Ties , 2014 .

[92]  Andreas Schotter,et al.  Performance effects of MNC headquarters-subsidiary conflict and the role of boundary spanners: The case of headquarter initiative rejection , 2011 .

[93]  Offshoring of Innovation: Global Innovation Networks in the Danish Biotech Industry , 2013 .

[94]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[95]  Willem Verbeke,et al.  Do Organizational Practices Matter in Role Stress Processes? A Study of Direct and Moderating Effects for Marketing-Oriented Boundary Spanners , 1996 .

[96]  R. Davison Offshoring information technology: Sourcing and outsourcing to a global workforce , 2006, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[97]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The (Un)Hidden Turmoil of Language in Global Collaboration , 2012 .

[98]  R. Ashmore,et al.  An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[99]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[100]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..