Additional electrodes on the Quartet™ LV lead provide more programmable pacing options than bipolar and tripolar equivalents

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate any benefits to the number of viable pacing vectors and maximal spatial coverage with quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads when compared with tripolar and bipolar equivalents in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and Results A meta-analysis of five previously published clinical trials involving the Quartet™ LV lead (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) was performed to evaluate the number of viable pacing vectors defined as capture thresholds ≤2.5 V and no phrenic nerve stimulation and maximal spatial coverage of viable vectors in CRT patients at pre-discharge (n = 370) and first follow-up (n = 355). Bipolar and tripolar lead configurations were modelled by systematic elimination of two and one electrode(s), respectively, from the Quartet lead. The Quartet lead with its four pacing electrodes exhibited the greatest number of pacing vectors per patient when compared with the best bipolar and the best tripolar modelled equivalents. Similarly, the Quartet lead provided the highest spatial coverage in terms of the distance between two furthest viable pacing cathodes when compared with the best bipolar and the best tripolar configurations (P < 0.05). Among the three modelled bipolar configurations, the lead configuration with the two most distal electrodes resulted in the highest number of viable pacing vectors. Among the four modelled tripolar configurations, elimination of the second proximal electrode (M3) resulted in the highest number of viable pacing options per patient. There were no significant differences observed between pre-discharge and first follow-up analyses. Conclusion The Quartet lead with its four electrodes and the capability to pace from four anatomical locations provided the highest number of viable pacing vectors at pre-discharge and first follow-up visits, providing more flexibility in device programming and enabling continuation of CRT in more patients when compared with bipolar and tripolar equivalents.

[1]  M. Biffi,et al.  Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[2]  C. Rinaldi,et al.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long‐Term Follow‐Up from a Multicenter Registry , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  A. Natale,et al.  Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs. bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study , 2014, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  L. Calò,et al.  Acute echocardiographic optimization of multiple stimulation configurations of cardiac resynchronization therapy through quadripolar left ventricular pacing: a tailored approach. , 2014, American heart journal.

[5]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[6]  A. Vado,et al.  Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[7]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  Acute effects of multisite left ventricular pacing on mechanical dyssynchrony in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2013, Journal of cardiac failure.

[8]  I. Fernández‐Lozano,et al.  Improvement in Hemodynamic Response Using a Quadripolar LV Lead , 2013, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  P. Khairy,et al.  Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Baker,et al.  Postoperative Performance of the Quartet® Left Ventricular Heart Lead , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  A. Natale,et al.  Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[12]  M. Biffi,et al.  Effect of Bipolar Electrode Spacing on Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and Left Ventricular Pacing Thresholds: An Acute Canine Study , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[13]  G. Boriani,et al.  First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  K. Rhode,et al.  The Acute Hemodynamic Response to LV Pacing within Individual Branches of the Coronary Sinus using a Quadripolar Lead , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  L. Goldman,et al.  Statin use and postoperative atrial fibrillation after major noncardiac surgery. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[16]  M. Ginks,et al.  Initial Single‐Center Experience of a Quadripolar Pacing Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2011, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Left Ventricular Lead Position and Clinical Outcome in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial , 2011, Circulation.

[18]  C. Rinaldi,et al.  Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  K. Ryu,et al.  Pacing electrode selection in a quadripolar left heart lead determines presence or absence of phrenic nerve stimulation. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[23]  C. Rinaldi,et al.  Elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation occurring during CRT , 2011, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.