Impact of combining quality measures on biometric sample matching

Biometric matching involves a comparison of two biometric data samples. In practical applications, one or both of the samples may be of degraded quality, in respect to the nominal quality of similar samples acquired in controlled conditions. It has been shown in prior art that in such situations, the integration of quality information into the process of bio-metric matching can lead to significantly improved classification performance of the biometric matcher. To facilitate such an integration, quality measures originating from both compared biometric samples are usually combined into one quality score. In this paper, we analyze the merit of doing so. We revisit the problem from a pattern classification perspective, and show that using individual quality measures as separate classification features frequently leads to a superior performance of a biometric system in comparison with the system in which quality measures are mapped into one quality score. We provide experimental support of this claim using synthetic data, as well as real biometric database, on the examples of face, fingerprint and multi-modal matching.

[1]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Quality Indices for Predicting Authentication Performance , 2005, AVBPA.

[2]  Craig I. Watson,et al.  User's Guide to NIST Fingerprint Image Software (NFIS) | NIST , 2001 .

[3]  Wei-Yun Yau,et al.  Fusion of Auxiliary Information for Multi-modal Biometrics Authentication , 2004, ICBA.

[4]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  On Face Image Quality Measures , 2006 .

[5]  Julian Fierrez.  Adapted fusion schemes for multimodal biometric authentication (Esquemas adaptados de fusión para autenticación biométrica multimodal) , 2006 .

[6]  Lawrence M Wein,et al.  Using fingerprint image quality to improve the identification performance of the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Incorporating Image Quality in Multi-algorithm Fingerprint Verification , 2006, ICB.

[8]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Improving Classification with Class-Independent Quality Measures: Q-stack in Face Verification , 2007, ICB.

[9]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Quality-based Score Level Fusion in Multibiometric Systems , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[10]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Image-Quality Estimation Methods , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[11]  Conrad Sanderson,et al.  Automatic Person Verification Using Speech and Face Information , 2003 .

[12]  Josef Kittler,et al.  A family of methods for quality-based multimodal biometric fusion using generative classifiers , 2008, 2008 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.

[13]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Biosec baseline corpus: A multimodal biometric database , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Elham Tabassi,et al.  Performance of Biometric Quality Measures , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Multimodal biometric authentication using quality signals in mobile communications , 2003, 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2003.Proceedings..

[16]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Impact of feature correlations on separation between bivariate normal distributions , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Localized Iris Image Quality Using 2-D Wavelets , 2006, ICB.