Combining Pairwise SVM Classifiers for Bond Rating

Prior studies on financial applications of data mining techniques mainly focused on the applicability of artificial neural networks, but recent research tended to investigate applicability of novel data mining techniques just like support vector machines. Support vector machines (SVMs) were originally devised for binary classification. But, in reality, there exist many problems which cannot be solved by just binary classification models, those are multiclass classification problems including bond rating. Researchers have tried to extend original SVM to multiclass classification. However, their studies have only focused on classifying samples into nominal categories. This study proposes Ordinal Multiclass SVMs which apply ordinal pairwise partitioning (OPP) to conventional SVMs in order to handle ordinal multiple classes efficiently and effectively. Our suggested model may use fewer classifiers but predict more accurately because it utilizes additional hidden information, the order of the classes. To validate our model, we apply it to the real-world bond rating case. In this study, we compare the results of the model to those of other multiclass classification algorithms. The result shows that Ordinal Multiclass SVMs improve prediction performance.

[1]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Ordinal Pairwise Partitioning (OPP) Approach to Neural Networks Training in Bond rating , 1997, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[2]  Constantin F. Aliferis,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis , 2004, Bioinform..

[3]  Tarun K. Sen,et al.  Predicting Bond Ratings Using Neural Networks: A Comparison with Logistic Regression , 1997, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[4]  Koby Crammer,et al.  On the Learnability and Design of Output Codes for Multiclass Problems , 2002, Machine Learning.

[5]  Richard T. Redmond,et al.  Expert systems for bond rating: a comparative analysis of statistical, rule‐based and neural network systems , 1993 .

[6]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Simple Decomposition Method for Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[7]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[8]  Jason Weston,et al.  Support vector machines for multi-class pattern recognition , 1999, ESANN.

[9]  F. Tay,et al.  Application of support vector machines in financial time series forecasting , 2001 .

[10]  Ingoo Han,et al.  A case-based approach using inductive indexing for corporate bond rating , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  John Platt,et al.  Large Margin DAG's for Multiclass Classification , 1999 .

[13]  Kyoung-jae Kim,et al.  Financial time series forecasting using support vector machines , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[14]  A. Refenes Neural Networks in the Capital Markets , 1994 .

[15]  J. Weston,et al.  Support Vector Machines for Multi-class Pattern Recognition 1. K-class Pattern Recognition 2. Solving K-class Problems with Binary Svms , 1999 .

[16]  StatnikovAlexander,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis , 2005 .

[17]  Soushan Wu,et al.  Credit rating analysis with support vector machines and neural networks: a market comparative study , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  John Moody,et al.  Architecture Selection Strategies for Neural Networks: Application to Corporate Bond Rating Predicti , 1995, NIPS 1995.

[19]  Ulrich H.-G. Kreßel,et al.  Pairwise classification and support vector machines , 1999 .