Surface Laplacian of scalp electrical signals and independent component analysis resolve EMG contamination of electroencephalogram.

The serious impact of electromyogram (EMG) contamination of electroencephalogram (EEG) is well recognised. The objective of this research is to demonstrate that combining independent component analysis with the surface Laplacian can eliminate EMG contamination of the EEG, and to validate that this processing does not degrade expected neurogenic signals. The method involves sequential application of ICA, using a manual procedure to identify and discard EMG components, followed by the surface Laplacian. The extent of decontamination is quantified by comparing processed EEG with EMG-free data that was recorded during pharmacologically induced neuromuscular paralysis. The combination of the ICA procedure and the surface Laplacian, with a flexible spherical spline, results in a strong suppression of EMG contamination at all scalp sites and frequencies. Furthermore, the ICA and surface Laplacian procedure does not impair the detection of well-known, cerebral responses; alpha activity with eyes-closed; ERP components (N1, P2) in response to an auditory oddball task; and steady state responses to photic and auditory stimulation. Finally, more flexible spherical splines increase the suppression of EMG by the surface Laplacian. We postulate this is due to ICA enabling the removal of local muscle sources of EMG contamination and the Laplacian transform being insensitive to distant (postural) muscle EMG contamination.

[1]  Kenneth J. Pope,et al.  Relation of Gamma Oscillations in Scalp Recordings to Muscular Activity , 2009, Brain Topography.

[2]  C. Tenke,et al.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): Implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Increased gamma-range activity in human sensorimotor cortex during performance of visuomotor tasks , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  E. Whitham,et al.  Scalp electrical recording during paralysis: Quantitative evidence that EEG frequencies above 20Hz are contaminated by EMG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Kenneth J. Pope,et al.  Thinking activates EMG in scalp electrical recordings , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[7]  Junshui Ma,et al.  Muscle artifacts in multichannel EEG: Characteristics and reduction , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Tyler S. Grummett,et al.  Automatic determination of EMG-contaminated components and validation of independent component analysis using EEG during pharmacologic paralysis , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Jürgen Kayser,et al.  Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Extended ICA Removes Artifacts from Electroencephalographic Recordings , 1997, NIPS.

[11]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[12]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans: a possible role for object representation. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Validation of ICA-based myogenic artifact correction for scalp and source-localized EEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  G. Buzsáki.  Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[17]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts: comparison between ICA and PCA , 1998, Neural Networks for Signal Processing VIII. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.98TH8378).

[20]  C. Tenke,et al.  Reference-free quantification of EEG spectra: Combining current source density (CSD) and frequency principal components analysis (fPCA) , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences revisited , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  Christian Sander,et al.  ICA-based muscle artefact correction of EEG data: What is muscle and what is brain? Comment on McMenamin et al. , 2011, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Knight,et al.  Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Electromyogenic Artifacts and Electroencephalographic Inferences , 2009, Brain Topography.

[25]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Kenneth J. Pope,et al.  Surface Laplacian of Central Scalp Electrical Signals is Insensitive to Muscle Contamination , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  W. Singer,et al.  Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  S P Fitzgibbon,et al.  Removal of EEG Noise and Artifact Using Blind Source Separation , 2007, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[30]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.