Discrete element modeling of a vibratory subsoiler

Discrete Element Modeling of a Vibratory Subsoiler J. van der Linde Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, South Africa. Thesis: MScEng (Mech) December 2007 Vibrating a tillage tool is an e ective way of reducing the draft force required to pull it through the soil. The degree of draft force reduction is dependent on the combination of operating parameters and soil conditions. It is thus necessary to optimize the vibratory implement for di erent conditions. Numerical modelling is more exible than experimental testing and analytical models, and less costly than experimental testing. The Discrete Element Method (DEM) was speci cally developed for granular materials such as soils and can be used to model a vibrating tillage tool for its design and optimization. The goal was thus to evaluate the ability of DEM to model a vibratory subsoiler and to investigate the cause of the draft force reduction. The DEM model was evaluated against data obtained from eld testing done with a full scale single tine vibratory subsoiler. Soil testing was also done for material characterization and for the calibration of DEM material properties. The subsoiler was simulated using a commercial code, PFC3D. The e ect on the simulation results of particle diameter, di erent bonding models and damping models was investigated. The nal simulations were evaluated against the experimental results in terms of the draft force and material behaviour. The cause of the draft force reduction due to vibration was also investigated with the aid of the DEM model. From the results it was concluded that DEM is able to model the vibratory subsoiler for its design and optimization. The DEM model also provided valuable insight into the cause of the draft force reduction such as the increased peak stresses due to vibration and the increase in particle kinetic energy.

[1]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Simulation on mechanical behavior of cohesive soil by Distinct Element Method , 2006 .

[2]  R. L. Braun,et al.  Viscosity, granular‐temperature, and stress calculations for shearing assemblies of inelastic, frictional disks , 1986 .

[3]  Vasily Vasilevic Sokolovski,et al.  Statics of soil media , 1960 .

[4]  D. Wolf,et al.  Force Schemes in Simulations of Granular Materials , 1996 .

[5]  Itzhak Shmulevich,et al.  Evaluation of link-track performances using DEM , 2006 .

[6]  Richard J. Godwin,et al.  Soil Failure with Narrow Tines , 1977 .

[7]  Spahn,et al.  Model for collisions in granular gases. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[8]  A. J. Koolen,et al.  Simulation of a soil loosening process by means of the modified distinct element method , 2002 .

[9]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Vibratory Tillage , 1972 .

[10]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Tillage Tool Design by the Finite Element Method: Part 1. Finite Element Modelling of Soil Plastic Behaviour , 1999 .

[11]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[12]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM simulation of industrial particle flows: case studies of dragline excavators, mixing in tumblers and centrifugal mills , 2000 .

[13]  Stefan Luding,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Granular Materials , 2004 .

[14]  Dr. Ir. Adrianus Jozef Koolen,et al.  Agricultural Soil Mechanics , 1983, Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences.

[15]  Kenshi Sakai,et al.  Design Parameters of Four-shank Vibrating Subsoiler , 1993 .

[16]  Stein Sture,et al.  Effectiveness of vibrating bulldozer and plow blades on draft force reduction , 1998 .

[17]  Robert Hamilton,et al.  Simulation of soil–blade interaction for sandy soil using advanced 3D finite element analysis , 2004 .

[18]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Vibratory Tillage , 1972 .

[19]  Vilas M. Salokhe,et al.  Laboratory investigations into soil failure under vibratory tillage tools , 1993 .

[20]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  An elastoplastic contact force–displacement model in the normal direction: displacement–driven version , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  T. Niyamapa,et al.  Force and pressure distribution under vibratory tillage tool , 2000 .

[22]  Brahmeshwar Mishra,et al.  A review of computer simulation of tumbling mills by the discrete element method: Part I—contact mechanics , 2003 .

[23]  R. L. Kushwaha,et al.  Three-dimensional, finite element interaction between soil and simple tillage tool , 1991 .

[24]  Stefan Luding,et al.  Collisions & Contacts between Two Particles , 1998 .

[25]  M. J. Butson,et al.  Vibratory soil cutting: II. An improved mathematical model , 1981 .

[26]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  A 3-D discrete-element method for dry granular flows of ellipsoidal particles , 2000 .

[27]  A. Klute Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[28]  Vilas M. Salokhe,et al.  Performance of an oscillating subsoiler in breaking a hardpan , 1999 .

[29]  R. J. Crawford,et al.  Mechanics of engineering materials , 1986 .

[30]  Jie Shen,et al.  Soil-Machine Interactions: A Finite Element Perspective , 1998 .

[31]  Edward McKyes,et al.  The cutting of soil by narrow blades , 1977 .

[32]  M. J. Butson,et al.  Vibratory soil cutting: I. Soil tank studies of draught and power requirements , 1981 .

[33]  T. Niyamapa,et al.  Soil disturbance and force mechanics of vibrating tillage tool , 2000 .

[34]  R. D. Mindlin Elastic Spheres in Contact Under Varying Oblique Forces , 1953 .