Enhancing learning? A comparison of teacher and teaching assistant interactions with pupils

In many countries, teaching assistants are working in schools in increasing numbers. While they formerly supported teachers by completing low-level administrative tasks, they are increasingly playing a pedagogical role and working directly with pupils, particularly those with special educational needs. However, little is known about the quality of the support that teaching assistants provide to these pupils. This paper systematically examines differences in the types and quality of interactions teaching assistants have with pupils compared with the interactions of teachers in the same classrooms. Differences were found, particularly in relation to the development of pupil thinking, and examples of the differential interactions are provided in the paper. Recommendations are made related to the need to examine existing models of teaching effectiveness to take account of the role of teaching assistants in classrooms and the role of teachers managing teaching assistants.

[1]  R. Fisher,et al.  Dialogic teaching: developing thinking and metacognition through philosophical discussion , 2007 .

[2]  Debra Myhill,et al.  Talk, talk, talk: teaching and learning in whole class discourse , 2006 .

[3]  Clare Martin,et al.  The Impact of Support Staff in Schools. Results from the Deployment and Impact of Support Staff (DISS) project. Strand 2 Wave 2 , 2009 .

[4]  Louise C Wilkinson,et al.  Classroom language and literacy learning. , 2000 .

[5]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[6]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  A Study of Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction , 2001 .

[7]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Effective Schools and Accomplished Teachers: Lessons about Primary-Grade Reading Instruction in Low-Income Schools , 2000, The Elementary School Journal.

[8]  C. Block,et al.  The expertise of literacy teachers: A continuum from preschool to Grade 5 , 2002 .

[9]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an analysis of discourse , 1977 .

[10]  P. Farrell,et al.  The Impact of Adult Support Staff on Pupils and Mainstream Schools , 2009 .

[11]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers , 2004 .

[12]  Bruce J. Biddle,et al.  The Study of Teaching , 1974 .

[13]  A. McKeough,et al.  Understanding Literacy Development: A Global View , 2006 .

[14]  M. Brundrett,et al.  Managing LSAs: an evaluation of the use of learning support assistants in an urban primary school , 2004 .

[15]  Evaluation of a Focused Literacy Teaching Programme in Reception and Year 1 Classes: classroom observations , 1999 .

[16]  J. Bruner Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[17]  M. Nystrand Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse As It Affects Reading Comprehension , 2006 .

[18]  K. Topping,et al.  Effective literacy teaching behaviours , 2005 .

[19]  P. Blatchford,et al.  The effect of support staff on pupil engagement and individual attention , 2009 .

[20]  Robert M. Klassen,et al.  'After the Statement': Reading progress made by secondary students with specific literacy difficulty provision , 2001 .

[21]  Frederick J. Morrison,et al.  EFFECTIVE READING COMPREHENSION INSTRUCTION: EXAMINING CHILD X INSTRUCTION INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[22]  M. Takala The Work of Classroom Assistants in Special and Mainstream Education in Finland. , 2007 .

[23]  S. Lyle Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice , 2008 .

[24]  Valerie Wilson,et al.  An ‘Extra Pair of Hands’? , 2003 .

[25]  Bert P. M. Creemers,et al.  The Effective Classroom , 1994 .

[26]  David Wray,et al.  The Teaching Practices of Effective Teachers of Literacy , 2000 .

[27]  Bonnie Knoke,et al.  A Day in Third Grade: A Large‐Scale Study of Classroom Quality and Teacher and Student Behavior , 2005, The Elementary School Journal.

[28]  Deborah Jones,et al.  Speaking, listening, planning and assessing: the teacher’s role in developing metacognitive awareness , 2007 .

[29]  B. Simon Inside the primary classroom , 1980 .

[30]  M. Holquist Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World , 1990 .

[31]  L. Abbott,et al.  Developing inclusive schools: the pivotal role of teaching assistants in promoting inclusion in special and mainstream schools in Northern Ireland , 2002 .

[32]  R. Alexander Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk , 2008 .

[33]  Michael F. Giangreco,et al.  Helping or Hovering? Effects of Instructional Assistant Proximity on Students with Disabilities , 1997 .

[34]  Keith T. Greaney,et al.  Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms , 2008 .

[35]  Susan B. Gerber,et al.  Teacher Aides and Students’ Academic Achievement , 2001 .

[36]  David Reynolds,et al.  The effectiveness of the use of learning support assistants in improving the mathematics achievement of low achieving pupils in primary school , 2003 .

[37]  Alysia D. Roehrig,et al.  The First Days of School in the Classrooms of Two More Effective and Four Less Effective Primary-Grades Teachers , 2004, The Elementary School Journal.

[38]  D. Westgate,et al.  Investigating classroom talk , 1987 .

[39]  James N. Britton,et al.  Language, the learner, and the school , 1969 .