Variability in Soft Classification Prediction and its implications for Sub-pixel Scale Change Detection and Super Resolution Mapping

The impact of intra-class spectral variability on the estimation of sub-pixel land-cover class composition with a linear mixture model is explored. It is shown that the nature of intra-class variation present has a marked impact on the accuracy of sub-pixel class composition estimation, as it violates the assumption that a class can be represented by a single spectral endmember. It is suggested that a distribution of possible class compositions can be derived from pixels instead of a single class composition prediction. This distribution provides a richer indication of possible subpixel class compositions and highlights a limitation for super-resolution mapping. Moreover, the class composition distribution information may be used to derive different scenarios of changes when used in a post-classification comparison type approach to change detection. This latter issue is illustrated with an example of forest cover change in Brazil from Landsat TM data.

[1]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[2]  C. Tucker,et al.  Tropical Deforestation and Habitat Fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite Data from 1978 to 1988 , 1993, Science.

[3]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data , 1996 .

[4]  P. Fisher The pixel: A snare and a delusion , 1997 .

[5]  Gail A. Carpenter,et al.  A Neural Network Method for Mixture Estimation for Vegetation Mapping , 1999 .

[6]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Confidence in linear spectral unmixing of single pixels , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Endmember bundles: a new approach to incorporating endmember variability into spectral mixture analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  G. Foody Monitoring the magnitude of land-cover change around the southern limits of the Sahara , 2001 .

[9]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  D. A. Stow,et al.  Using multiple image endmember spectral mixture analysis to study chaparral regrowth in southern California , 2003 .

[11]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  Gaussian mixture discriminant analysis and sub-pixel land cover characterization in remote sensing , 2003 .

[12]  J. C. Taylor,et al.  Sensitivity of mixture modelling to end‐member selection , 2003 .

[13]  A. Rogers,et al.  Reducing signature variability in unmixing coastal marsh Thematic Mapper scenes using spectral indices , 2004 .

[14]  Christopher Small,et al.  The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space , 2004 .

[15]  Y. Shimabukuro,et al.  Fraction images in multitemporal change detection , 2004 .

[16]  Weiguo Liu,et al.  Comparison of non-linear mixture models: sub-pixel classification , 2005 .

[17]  Conghe Song,et al.  Spectral mixture analysis for subpixel vegetation fractions in the urban environment: How to incorporate endmember variability? , 2005 .

[18]  Koen C. Mertens,et al.  A sub‐pixel mapping algorithm based on sub‐pixel/pixel spatial attraction models , 2006 .

[19]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Localized soft classification for super‐resolution mapping of the shoreline , 2006 .

[20]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Super-resolution land cover mapping with indicator geostatistics , 2006 .