Evaluation of Maritime Event Detection Against Missing Data

Detecting and preventing maritime events like collisions or unusual behaviour of vessels are of high importance for maritime safety and security. As the trust of human operators in automated maritime event detection and prediction depends on the quality of the corresponding algorithms, the evaluation methodology becomes a driving force for the future development of maritime event detection and forecasting methods. The main contribution of this article consists in the development of an evaluation methodology and its application to a selected set of maritime event detectors. The approach links a reference dataset, controlled data variations, maritime event detection algorithms with internal parameters, and performance criteria. Among pre-established possible input data variations applied to a reference Automatic Identification System (AIS) dataset, the article focuses on the evaluation of detection accuracy of maritime event detectors implemented with the Event Calculus logical language against variable amounts of missing data, as a frequently observable type of AIS data degradation. Twelve maritime event pattern detectors are evaluated and most of them are found to vary very little in performance while only one detector shows an unexpected strong performance drop giving insights into how to improve the detection method. Results are provided on a real AIS data enriched with specific simulated events.

[1]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A logic-based calculus of events , 1989, New Generation Computing.

[2]  Paul Davidsson,et al.  Evaluating learning algorithms and classifiers , 2007, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Database Syst..

[3]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  An Event Calculus for Event Recognition , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Pontus Svenson,et al.  SMARTracIn: a concept for spoof resistant tracking of vessels and detection of adverse intentions , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Executable specification of open multi-agent systems , 2010, Log. J. IGPL.

[6]  Cyril Ray,et al.  Heterogeneous integrated dataset for Maritime Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance , 2019, Data in brief.

[7]  Teodor C. Przymusinski On the Declarative Semantics of Deductive Databases and Logic Programs , 1988, Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming..

[8]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  Robust Classification for Imprecise Environments , 2000, Machine Learning.

[9]  Jean Roy,et al.  Exploitation of maritime domain ontologies for anomaly detection and threat analysis , 2010, 2010 International WaterSide Security Conference.

[10]  Anne-Laure Jousselme,et al.  Comparison of uncertainty representations for missing data in information retrieval , 2013, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[11]  Kalyan Moy Gupta,et al.  A comparative evaluation of anomaly detection algorithms for maritime video surveillance , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Göran Falkman,et al.  Supporting the Analytical Reasoning Process in Maritime Anomaly Detection: Evaluation and Experimental Design , 2010, 2010 14th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[13]  D. Rubin INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[14]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for the Cost-Sensitive Evaluation of Classifiers , 2000, ICML.