Combining deterministic and statistical approaches for PM10 forecasting in Europe

Abstract Well documented adverse health effects of airborne particulate matter (PM) stimulate intensive research aimed at understanding and forecasting its behaviour. Forecasting of PM levels is commonly performed with either statistical or deterministic chemistry-transport models (CTM). In this study, we investigate advantages of combining deterministic and statistical approaches for PM10 forecasting over Europe one day ahead. The proposed procedure involves statistical postprocessing of deterministic forecasts by using PM10 monitoring data. A series of experiments is performed using a state-of-the-art CTM (CHIMERE) and statistical models based on linear regressions. It is found that performance of both CTM simulations and “pure” statistical models is inferior to that of the combined models. In particular, the root mean squared error of the deterministic forecasts can be reduced, on the average, by up to 45 percent (specifically, from 12.8 to 6.9 μg/m3 at urban sites in summer) and the coefficient of determination can be almost doubled. Importantly, it is found that the combined models for rural sites in summer and for urban and suburban sites in both summer and winter are representative, on the average, not only for a given monitoring site used for their training, but also of territories of similar type of environment (rural, suburban or urban) within several hundreds of kilometers away.

[1]  Archontoula Chaloulakou,et al.  Neural Network and Multiple Regression Models for PM10 Prediction in Athens: A Comparative Assessment , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  Nicolas Moussiopoulos,et al.  PM10 forecasting for Thessaloniki, Greece , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  B. Denby,et al.  Interpolation and assimilation methods for European scale air quality assessment and mapping Part I: Review and recommendations , 2005 .

[4]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Prediction of daily averaged PM10 concentrations by statistical time-varying model , 2009 .

[5]  C. Seigneur,et al.  Modeling secondary organic aerosol formation via multiphase partitioning with molecular data. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Jorge Reyes,et al.  An integrated neural network model for PM10 forecasting , 2006 .

[7]  C. Pope Review: Epidemiological Basis for Particulate Air Pollution Health Standards , 2000 .

[8]  L. Wilson,et al.  The Canadian Updateable Model Output Statistics (UMOS) System: Validation against Perfect Prog , 2003 .

[9]  Philippe Thunis,et al.  Evaluation and intercomparison of Ozone and PM10 simulations by several chemistry transport models over four European cities within the CityDelta project , 2007 .

[10]  Robert Vautard,et al.  A comparison of simulated and observed ozone mixing ratios for the summer of 1998 in Western Europe , 2001 .

[11]  R. Vautard,et al.  Aerosol modeling with CHIMERE—preliminary evaluation at the continental scale , 2004 .

[12]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Simulation of multicomponent aerosol dynamics , 1992 .

[13]  Alma Hodzic,et al.  Long-term urban aerosol simulation versus routine particulate matter observations , 2005 .

[14]  B. Gomišček,et al.  AUPHEP—Austrian Project on Health Effects of Particulates—general overview , 2004 .

[15]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[16]  F. Meleux,et al.  Predictability of European air quality: Assessment of 3 years of operational forecasts and analyses by the PREV'AIR system , 2008 .

[17]  Ali Zolghadri,et al.  Adaptive nonlinear state-space modelling for the prediction of daily mean PM10 concentrations , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  A. Nenes,et al.  ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols , 1998 .

[19]  J. Hooyberghs,et al.  A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium , 2005 .

[20]  H. Glahn,et al.  The Use of Model Output Statistics (MOS) in Objective Weather Forecasting , 1972 .

[21]  Bertrand Bessagnet,et al.  Modeling dust emissions and transport within Europe: The Ukraine March 2007 event , 2008 .

[22]  Bruce Denby,et al.  Comparison of two data assimilation methods for assessing PM10 exceedances on the European scale , 2008 .

[23]  Siegfried Hörmann,et al.  Quality and performance of a PM10 daily forecasting model , 2008 .

[24]  M. Neuberger,et al.  The active surface of suspended particles as a predictor of lung function and pulmonary symptoms in Austrian school children , 2003 .

[25]  T. Wigley,et al.  Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations , 1997 .

[26]  F. Meleux,et al.  Prev'air: An Operational Forecasting and Mapping System for Air Quality in Europe , 2009 .

[27]  Alma Hodzic,et al.  A model inter-comparison study focussing on episodes with elevated PM10 concentrations , 2008 .

[28]  M. Molina,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher than expected , 2006 .

[29]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol Yields , 1996 .

[30]  Lance M. Leslie,et al.  A Single-Station Approach to Model Output Statistics Temperature Forecast Error Assessment , 2005 .