Benchmark Tests of Atom Segmentation Deep Learning Models with a Consistent Dataset.

The information content of atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images can often be reduced to a handful of parameters describing each atomic column, chief amongst which is the column position. Neural networks (NNs) are a high performance, computationally efficient method to automatically locate atomic columns in images, which has led to a profusion of NN models and associated training datasets. We have developed a benchmark dataset of simulated and experimental STEM images and used it to evaluate the performance of two sets of recent NN models for atom location in STEM images. Both models exhibit high performance for images of varying quality from several different crystal lattices. However, there are important differences in performance as a function of image quality, and both models perform poorly for images outside the training data, such as interfaces with large difference in background intensity. Both the benchmark dataset and the models are available using the Foundry service for dissemination, discovery, and reuse of machine learning models.

[1]  D. Morgan,et al.  Performance and limitations of deep learning semantic segmentation of multiple defects in transmission electron micrographs , 2022, Cell Reports Physical Science.

[2]  Wei Hao,et al.  Multi defect detection and analysis of electron microscopy images with deep learning , 2021, Computational Materials Science.

[3]  Dane Morgan,et al.  A Deep Learning Based Automatic Defect Analysis Framework for In-situ TEM Ion Irradiations , 2021, ArXiv.

[4]  Ayana Ghosh,et al.  AtomAI: A Deep Learning Framework for Analysis of Image and Spectroscopy Data in (Scanning) Transmission Electron Microscopy and Beyond , 2021, Nat. Mac. Intell..

[5]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Disentangling Rotational Dynamics and Ordering Transitions in a System of Self-Organizing Protein Nanorods via Rotationally Invariant Latent Representations. , 2021, ACS nano.

[6]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Exploring order parameters and dynamic processes in disordered systems via variational autoencoders , 2021, Science Advances.

[7]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  Norm-Preservation: Why Residual Networks Can Become Extremely Deep? , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Anru R. Zhang,et al.  Denoising atomic resolution 4D scanning transmission electron microscopy data with tensor singular value decomposition. , 2020, Ultramicroscopy.

[9]  Ondrej Dyck,et al.  Tracking atomic structure evolution during directed electron beam induced Si-atom motion in graphene via deep machine learning , 2018, Nanotechnology.

[10]  J. McChesney,et al.  High electrical conductivity in the epitaxial polar metals LaAuGe and LaPtSb , 2019, APL Materials.

[11]  Brian Hutchinson,et al.  Deep Learning for Semantic Segmentation of Defects in Advanced STEM Images of Steels , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Kyle Chard,et al.  A data ecosystem to support machine learning in materials science , 2019, MRS Communications.

[13]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  DLHub: Model and Data Serving for Science , 2018, 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS).

[14]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Depth with Nonlinearity Creates No Bad Local Minima in ResNets , 2019, Neural Networks.

[15]  Ondrej Dyck,et al.  Deep learning analysis of defect and phase evolution during electron beam-induced transformations in WS2 , 2018, npj Computational Materials.

[16]  Anru R. Zhang,et al.  Tensor SVD: Statistical and Computational Limits , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Deep Learning of Atomically Resolved Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Images: Chemical Identification and Tracking Local Transformations. , 2017, ACS nano.

[18]  P. Nellist,et al.  Optimising multi-frame ADF-STEM for high-precision atomic-resolution strain mapping. , 2017, Ultramicroscopy.

[19]  Jianwei Miao,et al.  A streaming multi-GPU implementation of image simulation algorithms for scanning transmission electron microscopy , 2017, Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging.

[20]  Benjamin Berkels,et al.  Joint denoising and distortion correction of atomic scale scanning transmission electron microscopy images , 2016, ArXiv.

[21]  Jian-Min Zuo,et al.  Advanced Transmission Electron Microscopy: Imaging and Diffraction in Nanoscience by Jian Min Zuo and John C.H. Spence , 2016 .

[22]  I. Foster,et al.  The Materials Data Facility: Data Services to Advance Materials Science Research , 2016, JOM.

[23]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[24]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[26]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[27]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  João Coelho,et al.  Atomic scale dynamics of a solid state chemical reaction directly determined by annular dark-field electron microscopy , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Benjamin Berkels,et al.  Picometre-precision analysis of scanning transmission electron microscopy images of platinum nanocatalysts , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networks , 2013, ICLR.

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[32]  Rebecca Willett,et al.  Poisson Noise Reduction with Non-local PCA , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[33]  W. Mader,et al.  Structural and elemental analysis of iron and indium doped zinc oxide by spectroscopic imaging in Cs-corrected STEM. , 2012, Micron.

[34]  Djemel Ziou,et al.  Image Quality Metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[35]  S. Bals,et al.  Statistical estimation of atomic positions from exit wave reconstruction with a precision in the picometer range. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[36]  Wei Chu,et al.  Multi-category Classification by Soft-Max Combination of Binary Classifiers , 2003, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[37]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .