The Effect of Light Field Reconstruction and Angular Resolution Reduction on the Quality of Experience

The quality of visual contents displayed on 3D autostereoscopic displays – such as light field displays – essentially depend on factors that are not present in case of 3D stereoscopic or 2D ones, like angular resolution. A higher number of views in a given field of view enables a smoother, continuous motion parallax, but evidently requires more resources to transmit and display. However, in several cases a sufficiently high number of views might not even be available, thus light field reconstruction is required to increase the density of intermediate views. In this paper we introduce the results of a research aiming to measure the perceptual difference between light field reconstruction and different angular resolutions via a series of subjective image quality assessments. The analysis also calls attention to transmission requirements of content for light field displays.

[1]  Robert Bregovic,et al.  Light Field Reconstruction Using Shearlet Transform , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Tibor Balogh,et al.  The HoloVizio system , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Zahir Y. Alpaslan,et al.  Light field display simulation for light field quality assessment , 2015, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Viva la resolution: the perceivable differences between image resolutions for light field displays , 2016 .

[5]  A. Barsi,et al.  Rendering multi-view plus depth data on light-field displays , 2011, 2011 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON).

[6]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  From a different point of view : how the field of view of light field displays affects the willingness to pay and to use , 2016 .

[7]  Enrico Gobbetti,et al.  Evaluating layout discrimination capabilities of continuous and discrete automultiscopic displays , 2010 .

[8]  Robert Bregovic,et al.  Image based rendering technique via sparse representation in shearlet domain , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[9]  Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems , 2015 .

[10]  A. Gotchev,et al.  QUALITY MEASUREMENTS OF 3 D LIGHT-FIELD DISPLAYS Péter , 2014 .

[11]  Nikolce Stefanoski,et al.  Automatic content creation for multiview autostereoscopic displays using image domain warping , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[12]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  Human Factors of 3D Displays , 2005 .

[13]  Pedro de la Cruz Ramos,et al.  Perceived Video Quality Estimation from Spatial and Temporal Information Contents and Network Performance Parameters in IPTV , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Conference on Digital Telecommunications.

[14]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Perceptual Quality of Reconstructed Medical Images on Projection-Based Light Field Displays , 2016, eHealth 360°.

[15]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks , 2006, TCHI.