High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.

PURPOSE In this study, we used a small field high resolution detector in conjunction with a full field flat panel detector to implement and investigate the dual detector volume-of-interest (VOI) cone beam breast computed tomography (CBCT) technique on a bench-top system. The potential of using this technique to image small calcifications without increasing the overall dose to the breast was demonstrated. Significant reduction of scatter components in the high resolution projection image data of the VOI was also shown. METHODS With the regular flat panel based CBCT technique, exposures were made at 80 kVp to generate an air kerma of 6 mGys at the isocenter. With the dual detector VOI CBCT technique, a high resolution small field CMOS detector was used to scan a cylindrical VOI (2.5 cm in diameter and height, 4.5 cm off-center) with collimated x-rays at four times of regular exposure level. A flat panel detector was used for full field scan with low x-ray exposures at half of the regular exposure level. The low exposure full field image data were used to fill in the truncated space in the VOI scan data and generate a complete projection image set. The Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) filtered backprojection algorithm was used to reconstruct high resolution images for the VOI. Two scanning techniques, one breast centered and the other VOI centered, were implemented and investigated. Paraffin cylinders with embedded thin aluminum (Al) wires were imaged and used in conjunction with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dose measurements to demonstrate the ability of this technique to image small calcifications without increasing the mean glandular dose (MGD). RESULTS Using exposures that produce an air kerma of 6 mGys at the isocenter, the regular CBCT technique was able to resolve the cross-sections of Al wires as thin as 254 μm in diameter in the phantom. For the specific VOI studied, by increasing the exposure level by a factor of 4 for the VOI scan and reducing the exposure level by a factor of 2 for the full filed scan, the dual-detector CBCT technique was able to resolve the cross-sections of Al wires as thin as 152 μm in diameter. The CNR evaluated for the entire Al wire cross-section was found to be improved from 5.5 in regular CBCT to 14.4 and 16.8 with the breast centered and VOI centered scanning techniques, respectively. Even inside VOI center, the VOI scan resulted in significant dose saving with the dose reduced by a factor of 1.6 at the VOI center. Dose saving outside the VOI was substantial with the dose reduced by a factor of 7.3 and 7.8 at the breast center for the breast centered and VOI centered scans, respectively, when compared to full field scan at the same exposure level. The differences between the two dual detector techniques in terms of dose saving and scatter reduction were small with VOI scan at 4× exposure level and full field scan at 0.5 × exposure level. The MGDs were only 94% of that from the regular CBCT scan. CONCLUSIONS For the specific VOI studied, the dual detector VOI CBCT technique has the potential to provide high quality images inside the VOI with MGD similar to or even lower than that of full field breast CBCT. It was also found that our results were compromised by the use of inadequate detectors for the VOI scan. An appropriately selected detector would better optimize the image quality improvement that can be achieved with the VOI CBCT technique.

[1]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[2]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[3]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Investigation of optimal kVp settings for CT mammography using a flat-panel imager , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  P. Huynh,et al.  The false-negative mammogram. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  S Rudin,et al.  Region of interest (ROI) computed tomography , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Daniel Kolditz,et al.  Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose. , 2010, Medical physics.

[7]  Tianpeng Wang,et al.  Dual resolution cone beam breast CT: a feasibility study. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Reduction in x-ray scatter and radiation dose for volume-of-interest (VOI) cone-beam breast CT--a phantom study. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Rotational micro-CT using a clinical C-arm angiography gantry. , 2008, Medical physics.

[11]  A. Murray,et al.  Advances in luminescence instrument systems , 2000 .

[12]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Pierre Grangeat,et al.  Region-of-interest cone-beam computed tomography , 1995 .

[14]  D. Berry,et al.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer , 2005 .

[15]  J Whitehead,et al.  Mammographic calcifications and risk of subsequent breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  John M Boone,et al.  Breast CT: potential for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. , 2006, Future oncology.

[17]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  F F Yin,et al.  Adaptive portal CT reconstruction: a simulation study. , 2000, Medical physics.

[19]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Olivier Tousignant,et al.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium flat-panel detector for digital fluoroscopy , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Feasibility of volume-of-interest (VOI) scanning technique in cone beam breast CT--a preliminary study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[22]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Yoji Urata,et al.  Dynamic helical CT mammography of breast cancer , 2006, Radiation Medicine.

[24]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  A Reconstruction Algorithm from Truncated Projections , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[26]  J E Bowsher,et al.  Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Erik L. Ritman,et al.  Local Tomography II , 1997, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[28]  S. McKeever,et al.  Recent advances in dosimetry using the optically stimulated luminescence of Al2O3:C. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[29]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Flat-panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: preliminary phantom study , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[30]  Tianpeng Wang,et al.  Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study. , 2011, Medical physics.

[31]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.