Typology Selection of Retaining Walls Based on Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods

In civil engineering and construction, in the selection of the most adequate and sustainable alternative, all of the alternatives and selection criteria, such as the requirements of the construction process (which are often overlooked) and the preferences of designers, clients, or contractors, are not always taken into account. The purpose of this article is to suggest a methodology that may allow studying all of the possible alternatives to find the most ideal solution among all of the existing possibilities for the selection of retaining walls to be built in infrastructures in different environments. For this purpose, all typologies of retaining walls and selection criteria (external requirements, construction requirements, characteristics of the natural land and economic criteria) are first identified. Subsequently, a simple methodological method is proposed, allowing the relative importance of each criterion to be established and allowing us to select the most suitable solution for each situation by successively applying different multicriteria decision-making methods. Finally, the methodology developed is applied to two projects in different locations with different constraints. The results obtained provide a set of compromise solutions that remain as best-rank alternatives when the weights of the criteria change. Therefore, the methodology developed can be applied to the selection of typologies of other structures in future projects.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks , 2004 .

[2]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Eugenio Pellicer,et al.  A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  B. Sennaroglu,et al.  A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods , 2018 .

[5]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel neutrosophic CODAS method: Selection among wind energy plant locations , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[6]  Ibrahim Badi,et al.  SITE SELECTION OF DESALINATION PLANT IN LIBYA BY USING COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT (CODAS) METHOD , 2018 .

[7]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[8]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches , 2015 .

[9]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Collaborative Value Modelling in corporate contexts with MACBETH , 2019, ITQM.

[10]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Eleftherios Siskos,et al.  Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: A robustness concern , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Rank Reversal and the VIKOR Method: An Empirical Evaluation , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[13]  Hany F. Shehata Retaining walls with relief shelves , 2016, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions.

[14]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Life cycle assessment of cost-optimized buttress earth-retaining walls: A parametric study , 2017 .

[15]  Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour,et al.  AHP-VIKOR Bridge Structural System Selection in Urban Areas Tehran Interchanges Case Study , 2016 .

[16]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS , 2011 .

[17]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[18]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A critical study on rank reversal problem , 2018 .

[19]  M. Sikder,et al.  Design basis and economic aspects of different types of retaining walls , 2004 .

[20]  Yen-Ching Chuang,et al.  A Hybrid MCDM Model for Improving the Electronic Health Record to Better Serve Client Needs , 2017 .

[21]  San Cristobal,et al.  Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods , 2012 .

[22]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design , 2016 .

[23]  Joaquín J. Pons,et al.  Life cycle assessment of earth-retaining walls: An environmental comparison , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  A cognitive approach for the multi-objective optimization of RC structural problems , 2015 .

[25]  Ghang Lee,et al.  Decision tree for selecting retaining wall systems based on logistic regression analysis , 2010 .

[26]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[27]  Aydin Çelen,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Normalization Procedures in TOPSIS Method: With an Application to Turkish Deposit Banking Market , 2014, Informatica.

[28]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[29]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  Decision complexity and consensus in Web-based spatial decision making: A case study of site selection problem using GIS and multicriteria analysis , 2015 .

[30]  Blanca Ceballos,et al.  El método TOPSIS relativo vs. absoluto , 2013 .

[31]  José Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud,et al.  Group Decision-Making Based on the VIKOR Method with Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy Information , 2019, Symmetry.

[32]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  On rank reversal and TOPSIS method , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..

[34]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[35]  Ying Luo,et al.  On rank reversal in decision analysis , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[36]  Ivan Belošević,et al.  Group decision making process for early stage evaluations of infrastructure projects using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment , 2018 .

[37]  J. L. Alcaraz,et al.  Evaluación de Tecnología utilizando TOPSIS en Presencia de Multi-colinealidad en Atributos: ¿Por qué usar distancia de Mahalanobis? , 2013 .