The economic impact of global climate and tropospheric oxone on world agricultural production

The objective of my thesis is to analyze the economic impact on agriculture production from changes in climate and tropospheric ozone, and related policy interventions. The analysis makes use of the Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model, a computable general equilibrium model of the world economy and crop yield results from the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), a biogeochemical model of terrestrial vegetation. I disaggregated the original EPPA model to capture the dynamic behaviors of crops, livestock and forestry within the agriculture sector. Further calibration was done to validate projections on future food shares according to Engel’s Law. Results from AIDADS (An Implicit Direct Additive Demand System) were used to adjust the model, as the EPPA Agriculture Model was implemented using CES (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) consumption function that, other things equal, keeps the food share constant as income grows. My research shows that the direct effects of environmental change on yields are substantially moderated in terms of production effects as a result of crop sector adaptations and reallocation of resources within the economy. However, costs (or benefits) resulting from reallocation of resources show up as losses (or gains) in aggregate economic consumption. The findings also uncover additional benefits of policies that impose greenhouse gas emissions constraints as they mitigate damages from ozone pollutions. For example, in 2005 the consumption loss due to ozone damage is estimated to be 7.4 billions (5% of the value of crop production) for the United States, 16.5 billions (8.4%) for the European Union, and 17.8 billions (9.8%) for China. In a scenario where greenhouse gas emissions are controlled, the consumption loss is reduced by 28%, 33%, and 23% for the US, the EU and China by 2050, respectively. Therefore, ozone pollution policy and climate policy (because it reduces ozone precursor emissions) are both effective in reducing ozone damages considerably. Thesis Supervisor: John M. Reilly Title: Associate Director for Research, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change

[1]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A flexible climate model for use in integrated assessments , 1998 .

[2]  SENSITIVITY OF THE RUSSIAN AGRICULTURE TO CHANGES IN CLIMATE, CO2 AND TROPOSPHERIC OZONE CONCENTRATIONS AND SOIL FERTILITY , 1997 .

[3]  R. Prinn,et al.  Impact of emissions, chemistry and climate on atmospheric carbon monoxide: 100-yr predictions from a global chemistry–climate model , 1999 .

[4]  G. Hanoch.  Production and Demand Models with Direct or Indirect Implicit Additivity , 1975 .

[5]  P. Preckel,et al.  Changes in the Structure of Global Food Demand , 1998 .

[6]  M. Hoerling,et al.  The Perfect Ocean for Drought , 2003, Science.

[7]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Surface Ozone in China and its Possible Impact on Agricultural Crop Yields , 2000 .

[8]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Integrated Global System Model for Climate Policy Assessment: Feedbacks and Sensitivity Studies , 1999 .

[9]  Denise L. Mauzerall,et al.  PROTECTING AGRICULTURAL CROPS FROM THE EFFECTS OF TROPOSPHERIC OZONE EXPOSURE: Reconciling Science and Standard Setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia , 2001 .

[10]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Linking a global terrestrial biogeochemical model and a 2‐dimensional climate model: implications for the global carbon budget , 1997 .

[11]  Ronald G. Prinn,et al.  Ozone effects on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model , 2002 .

[12]  Maureen T. Rimmer,et al.  An implicitly additive demand system , 1996 .

[13]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Transient climate change and net ecosystem production of the terrestrial biosphere , 1998, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[14]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[15]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Quadratic Engel Curves and Consumer Demand , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  U.S. Agriculture and Climate Change: New Results , 2003 .

[17]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information , 2004 .

[18]  Effects of ozone on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model , 2004 .

[19]  N. Islam,et al.  Population and food in the early twenty-first century: meeting future food demands of an increasing population. , 1995 .

[20]  Claude B. Courbois,et al.  Livestock to 2020: The Next Food Revolution , 2001 .

[21]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  A global interactive chemistry and climate model: Formulation and testing , 1998 .

[22]  P. Preckel,et al.  Projecting World Food Demand Using Alternative Demand Systems , 2003, GTAP Working Paper.

[23]  Robert McDougall,et al.  Global trade, assistance, and production : The GTAP 5 Data Base , 2002 .

[24]  F. Kessler.  Projections , 2020, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography.

[25]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  An efficient climate model with a 3D ocean and statistical–dynamical atmosphere* , 2002 .

[26]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.