Modeling receptor-mediated processes with dioxin: implications for pharmacokinetics and risk assessment.

Dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; TCDD), a widespread polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbon, caused tumors in the liver and other sites when administered chronically to rats at doses as low as 0.01 microgram/kg/day. It functions in combination with a cellular protein, the Ah receptor, to alter gene regulation, and this resulting modulation of gene expression is believed to be obligatory for both dioxin toxicity and carcinogenicity. The U.S. EPA is reevaluating its dioxin risk assessment and, as part of this process, will be developing risk assessment approaches for chemicals, such as dioxin, whose toxicity is receptor-mediated. This paper describes a receptor-mediated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PB-PK) model for the tissue distribution and enzyme-inducing properties of dioxin and discusses the potential role of these models in a biologically motivated risk assessment. In this model, ternary interactions among the Ah receptor, dioxin, and DNA binding sites lead to enhanced production of specific hepatic proteins. The model was used to examine the tissue disposition of dioxin and the induction of both a dioxin-binding protein (presumably, cytochrome P4501A2), and cytochrome P4501A1. Tumor promotion correlated more closely with predicted induction of P4501A1 than with induction of hepatic binding proteins. Although increased induction of these proteins is not expected to be causally related to tumor formation, these physiological dosimetry and gene-induction response models will be important for biologically motivated dioxin risk assessments in determining both target tissue dose of dioxin and gene products and in examining the relationship between these gene products and the cellular events more directly involved in tumor promotion.

[1]  K. Dold,et al.  Targets for dioxin: genes for plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 and interleukin-1 beta. , 1991, Science.

[2]  L. Birnbaum,et al.  Disposition of 2,3,7,8-tetrabromodibenzo-p-dioxin and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat: biliary excretion and induction of cytochromes CYP1A1 and CYP1A2. , 1991, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

[3]  J. Whitlock,et al.  Genetic and molecular aspects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin action. , 1990, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[4]  T. Gasiewicz,et al.  Cytosolic receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Evidence for a homologous nature among various mammalian species. , 1984, Molecular pharmacology.

[5]  D J Paustenbach,et al.  A physiological pharmacokinetic description of the tissue distribution and enzyme-inducing properties of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat. , 1990, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[6]  G. Lucier,et al.  Dose-dependent elevation of Ah receptor binding by TCDD in rat liver. , 1987, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[7]  M. Andersen,et al.  Biological and physiological factors involved in disposition of dioxin and related compounds , 1992 .

[8]  H. Hagenmaier,et al.  Distribution of PCDDs and PCDFs in rat tissues following various routes of administration , 1989 .

[9]  M. Andersen,et al.  A perspective on biologically-based approaches to dioxin risk assessment. , 1991, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  T. Gasiewicz,et al.  In vivo kinetics and DNA-binding properties of the Ah receptor in the golden Syrian hamster. , 1988, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[11]  C. Bradfield,et al.  Characterization of polyclonal antibodies to the Ah receptor prepared by immunization with a synthetic peptide hapten. , 1991, Molecular pharmacology.

[12]  H. Pitot,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the promotion by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin of hepatocarcinogenesis from diethylnitrosamine. , 1980, Cancer research.

[13]  D J Paustenbach,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of [125I]-2-iodo-3,7,8-trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in mice: analysis with a physiological modeling approach. , 1990, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  R. A. Neal,et al.  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin tissue distribution, excretion, and effects on clinical chemical parameters in guinea pigs. , 1979, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[15]  R. A. Neal,et al.  Tissue distribution, excretion, and metabolism of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the Golden Syrian hamster. , 1980, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[16]  A. Okey,et al.  Downregulation of the Ah receptor in mouse hepatoma cells treated in culture with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. , 1991, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[17]  D J Paustenbach,et al.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. , 1988, Toxicology letters.

[18]  E. Glover,et al.  [125I]2-iodo-3,7,8-trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-binding species in mouse liver induced by agonists for the Ah receptor: characterization and identification. , 1989, Molecular pharmacology.

[19]  L S Birnbaum,et al.  Physiological model for the pharmacokinetics of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran in several species. , 1983, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[20]  C. Wade,et al.  Results of a two-year chronic toxicity and oncogenicity study of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in rats. , 1978, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  G. Perdew Comparison of the nuclear and cytosolic forms of the Ah receptor from Hepa 1c1c7 cells: charge heterogeneity and ATP binding properties. , 1991, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[22]  G. Clark,et al.  Ovarian hormones enhance 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated increases in cell proliferation and preneoplastic foci in a two-stage model for rat hepatocarcinogenesis. , 1991, Cancer research.

[23]  K. Courtney,et al.  Teratology studies with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. , 1971, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[24]  R. Maronpot,et al.  A method to quantitate the relative initiating and promoting potencies of hepatocarcinogenic agents in their dose-response relationships to altered hepatic foci. , 1987, Carcinogenesis.

[25]  J. Gustafsson,et al.  The specific DNA binding activity of the dioxin receptor is modulated by the 90 kd heat shock protein. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[26]  J. Kissel,et al.  Assessing the elimination of 2,3,7,8-TCDD from humans with a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model , 1988 .

[27]  J. Q. Rose,et al.  The fate of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin following single and repeated oral doses to the rat. , 1976, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[28]  S. Aust,et al.  TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) is a tight binding inhibitor of cytochrome P-450d. , 1989, Journal of biochemical toxicology.

[29]  H. Matthews,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of PCBs , 1984 .

[30]  F A Smith,et al.  Three-generation reproduction study of rats given 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the diet. , 1979, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.