Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement

Abstract Although social media have been used by public relations practitioners as a key vehicle for crisis communication, little is known about how these platforms were utilized by public health organizations in infectious disease outbreak situations and how this may have shaped the publics’ responses to the outbreak on and off social media. Taking the approach of strategic health risk communication, this study examined Ebola-related social media posts by three major health organizations, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF, also known as Doctors without Borders), on Twitter and Instagram, focusing on the types of communication that were used during the outbreak, the content and context of these communications, and the responses they elicited from the publics. While both platforms were utilized by all three health organizations, the results suggest that Instagram may be a particularly useful platform for establishing meaningful, interactive communication with the publics in times of global health crises, as evidenced by significantly greater levels of engagement on the part of health organizations and the publics. Furthermore, our findings indicate that social media messaging may be most effective when it is used by health organizations that are familiar with and to the publics, and when it is based on the strategic use of risk communication principles such as solution-based messaging, incorporation of visual imagery, and acknowledgement of public fears and concerns. We discuss the results in the context of strategic health risk communication guidelines and implications for public relations practice.

[1]  Michael J. Palenchar,et al.  Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society , 2007 .

[2]  Vincent T. Covello,et al.  Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the commnication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting , 2001, Journal of Urban Health.

[3]  D. Glik Risk communication for public health emergencies. , 2007, Annual review of public health.

[4]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Helping the Public Make Health Risk Decisions , 1989 .

[5]  K. Wise Vision and state health department public relations practitioners: Prepared to lead? , 2012 .

[6]  D. Butler Global Ebola response kicks into gear at last , 2014, Nature.

[7]  K. Wise Opportunities for public relations research in public health , 2001 .

[8]  Sherry J. Holladay,et al.  Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets , 2002 .

[9]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[10]  Chelsea L. Woods When more than reputation is at risk: How two hospitals responded to Ebola , 2016 .

[11]  Saleem Alhabash,et al.  Redefining virality in less broad strokes: Predicting viral behavioral intentions from motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter , 2015, New Media Soc..

[12]  L. G. Doak,et al.  The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[13]  Vilma Luoma-aho,et al.  Online authority communication during an epidemic: A Finnish example , 2011 .

[14]  A. Kata A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. , 2010, Vaccine.

[15]  Michael L. Kent,et al.  Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: Why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise? , 2012 .

[16]  A. Green WHO and partners launch Ebola response plan , 2014, The Lancet.

[17]  Barbara J Reynolds Building trust through social media. CDC's experience during the H1N1 influenza response. , 2010, Marketing health services.

[18]  L. Gostin,et al.  Ebola: a crisis in global health leadership , 2014, The Lancet.

[19]  O. J. Dunn Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums , 1964 .

[20]  D. Mckie,et al.  Public relations as a strategic intelligence for the 21st century: Contexts, controversies, and challenges , 2016 .

[21]  Sora Kim,et al.  How organizations framed the 2009 H1N1 pandemic via social and traditional media: Implications for U , 2011 .

[22]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  Managing and sharing H1N1 crisis information using social media bookmarking services , 2013 .

[23]  V. Covello,et al.  Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis Communication , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[24]  Maeve Duggan,et al.  Social Media Update 2016 , 2016 .

[25]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[26]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less , 2010, ArXiv.

[27]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  H Kunreuther,et al.  Determinants of Priority for Risk Reduction: The Role of Worry , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  H. Joffe,et al.  Representations of far-flung illnesses: the case of Ebola in Britain. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[30]  Sheila M. McAllister-Spooner Fulfilling the dialogic promise: A ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles , 2009 .

[31]  D. Bortree,et al.  Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles , 2009 .

[32]  Billie Jo Hance,et al.  Results of a National Symposium on Risk Communication: Next Steps for Government Agencies , 1995 .

[33]  L. Macdonald,et al.  Reputation, Relationships, Risk Communication, and the Role of Trust in the Prevention and Control of Communicable Disease: A Review , 2013, Journal of health communication.