Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research

Qualitative research is often associated with interpretivism, but alternatives do exist. Besides critical research and sometimes positivism, qualitative research in information systems can be performed following a paradigm of pragmatism. This paradigm is associated with action, intervention and constructive knowledge. This paper has picked out interpretivism and pragmatism as two possible and important research paradigms for qualitative research in information systems. It clarifies each paradigm in an ideal-typical fashion and then conducts a comparison revealing commonalities and differences. It is stated that a qualitative researcher must either adopt an interpretive stance aiming towards an understanding that is appreciated for being interesting; or a pragmatist stance aiming for constructive knowledge that is appreciated for being useful in action. The possibilities of combining pragmatism and interpretivism in qualitative research in information systems are analysed. A research case (conducted through action research (AR) and design research (DR)) that combines interpretivism and pragmatism is used as an illustration. It is stated in the paper that pragmatism has influenced IS research to a fairly large extent, albeit in a rather implicit way. The paradigmatic foundations are seldom known and explicated. This paper contributes to a further clarification of pragmatism as an explicit research paradigm for qualitative research in information systems. Pragmatism is considered an appropriate paradigm for AR and DR.

[1]  Daniel B. Fishman,et al.  The Case for Pragmatic Psychology , 2020 .

[2]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis , 1996 .

[3]  R. Weber.  Editor's comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view , 2004 .

[4]  H. S. Thayer.  Meaning and Action , 1981 .

[5]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Action research and design science research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar , 2009, ECIS.

[6]  Pär Mårtensson,et al.  Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation , 2004, MIS Q..

[7]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Exemplifying Interpretive Research in Information Systems: an Overview , 1998, Journal of Information and Technology.

[8]  J. Fitzmaurice.  Economy and Society , 1998 .

[9]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[11]  P. Järvinen.  Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[12]  Paul Tibbetts,et al.  Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism , 1972 .

[13]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[14]  William K. McHenry,et al.  The Russian's federation's Y2K policy: too little, too late? , 1999 .

[15]  Richard Shusterman.  Pragmatism and East-Asian Thought , 2004 .

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[17]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[18]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Ned Kock,et al.  Information systems action research: serving two demanding masters , 2001 .

[20]  R. Boland.  Phenomenology: a preferred approach to research on information systems , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[21]  Göran Goldkuhl.  Practical Inquiry as Action Research and Beyond , 2008, ECIS.

[22]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice , 1999 .

[24]  W. Mays,et al.  MEANING AND ACTION: A CRITICAL HISTORY OF PRAGMATISM , 1969 .

[25]  Göran Goldkuhl.  What does it mean to serve the citizen in e-services? - Towards a practical theory founded in socio-instrumental pragmatism , 2007 .

[26]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[27]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan , 2000 .

[28]  G. Goldkuhl.  What kind of pragmatism in information systems research , 2008 .

[29]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[30]  J. Dewey.  Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Allen S. Lee.  Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research , 1991 .

[34]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[35]  Kristin Braa,et al.  Interpretation, intervention, and reduction in the organizational laboratory: a framework for in-context information system research , 1999 .

[36]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[37]  David Smith,et al.  The logic of pragmatic thinking : from Peirce to Habermas , 1994 .

[38]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[39]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[40]  W. Torbert,et al.  The Distinctive Questions Developmental Action Inquiry Asks , 1999 .

[41]  Charles S. Peirce.  An Anthology of Nineteenth-Century American Science Writing: “How to Make Our Ideas Clear” (excerpt) Popular Science Monthly (1878) , 2012 .

[42]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[43]  Tom Butler,et al.  Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[44]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[45]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[46]  James R Cook.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[47]  C. Peirce.  How to Make Our Ideas Clear , 2011, The Nature of Truth.

[48]  A. L. Bertrand,et al.  The Theory of Organizations. , 1972 .

[49]  P. Marshall,et al.  Social constructionism with a twist of pragmatism: a suitable cocktail for information systems research , 2005 .

[50]  Andrew C. Wicks,et al.  Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-Positivism, and the Search for Ethics , 1998 .

[51]  Chris Stevenson.  Practical inquiry/theory in nursing. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[52]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Nigel Pleasants,et al.  A Philosophy for the Social Sciences: Realism, Pragmatism, or neither? , 2003 .

[54]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A social action model of situated information systems design , 1999, DATB.

[55]  H. Chaiklin,et al.  Pragmatism and Social Theory , 1994 .

[56]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[58]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information Systems and Qualitative Research , 1997, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[59]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Theory As a Case of Design: Lessons for Design from the Philosophy of Science , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[60]  G. Goldkuhl.  Meanings of Pragmatism: Ways to conduct information systems research , 2004 .

[61]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[62]  Robert Liebendorfer.  Mind, self and society , 1960 .

[63]  N. Kock.  Information Systems Action Research , 2007 .

[64]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader , 2002 .

[65]  A. Schutz.  On Phenomenology And Social Relations , 1970 .

[66]  Pak Yoong,et al.  Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends , 2002 .

[67]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[68]  Richard Rorty,et al.  Pragmatism, Relativism, and Irrationalism , 1980, The New Social Theory Reader.

[69]  Pertti Järvinen,et al.  SERIES OF PUBLICATIONS D  –  NET PUBLICATIONS , 2005 .

[70]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2007 .

[71]  Edmund Arens,et al.  The Logic of Pragmatic Thinking , 1996 .

[72]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Towards dissolution of the is research debate: from polarization to polarity , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[73]  John Dewey.  O desenvolvimento do pragmatismo americano , 2007 .

[74]  Arthur O. Lovejoy.  The Thirteen Pragmatisms. II , 1908 .

[75]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[76]  Mike Metcalfe,et al.  Pragmatic inquiry , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[77]  Horace Standish Thayer.  Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism , 1980 .

[78]  Vernon E. Cronen,et al.  Practical theory, practical art, and the pragmatic‐systemic account of inquiry , 2001 .

[79]  Julie Fisher,et al.  E-Commerce Research in Australia: Inviting a Comparative Analysis , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[80]  R. Boland.  Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process , 2002 .

[81]  M. D. Myers,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research in information systems , 2002 .

[82]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[84]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Collaborative Practice Research , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Ned Kock.  Information Systems Action Research: An Applied View of Emerging Concepts and Methods (Integrated Series in Information Systems) , 2006 .

[86]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Realistic Pragmatism: An Introduction to Pragmatic Philosophy , 1999 .

[87]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..