Cluster Analysis as a Method for Determining Size Ranges for Spinal Implants: Disc Lumbar Replacement Prosthesis Dimensions from Magnetic Resonance Images

Study Design. Statistical analysis of clinical radiologic data. Objective. To develop an objective method for finding the number of sizes for a lumbar disc replacement. Summary of Background Data. Cluster analysis is a well-established technique for sorting observations into clusters so that the “similarity level” is maximal if they belong to the same cluster and minimal otherwise. Methods. Magnetic resonance scans from 69 patients, with no abnormal discs, yielded 206 sagittal and transverse images of 206 discs (levels L3–L4–L5–S1). Anteroposterior and lateral dimensions were measured from vertebral margins on transverse images; disc heights were measured from sagittal images. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to determine the number of clusters followed by nonhierarchical (K-means) cluster analysis. Discriminant analysis was used to determine how well the clusters could be used to classify an observation. Results. The most successful method of clustering the data involved the following parameters: anteroposterior dimension; lateral dimension (both were the mean of results from the superior and inferior margins of a vertebral body, measured on transverse images); and maximum disc height (from a midsagittal image). These were grouped into 7 clusters so that a discriminant analysis was capable of correctly classifying 97.1% of the observations. The mean and standard deviations for the parameter values in each cluster were determined. Conclusions. Cluster analysis has been successfully used to find the dimensions of the minimum number of prosthesis sizes required to replace L3–L4 to L5–S1 discs; the range of sizes would enable them to be used at higher lumbar levels in some patients.

[1]  S. Aharinejad,et al.  Morphometric analysis of vertebrae and intervertebral discs as a basis of disc replacement. , 1990, The American journal of anatomy.

[2]  Chen-An Tsai,et al.  Multi-class clustering and prediction in the analysis of microarray data. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[3]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Hansen A. Yuan,et al.  Prosthetic disc replacement: the future? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  S. Gibson,et al.  Correlation between inter-vertebral disc morphology and the results in patients undergoing Graf ligament stabilisation , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[6]  W. F. Deans,et al.  Design of spinous process hooks for flexible fixation of the lumbar spine , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of mechanical engineers. Part H, journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  C. D. Ray.  The PDN® prosthetic disc-nucleus device , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[8]  J. Meakin,et al.  Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk: prediction of suitable properties of a replacement material using finite element analysis , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[9]  R. Petsch,et al.  Le Sequenze Turbo Spin Echo , 1994 .

[10]  J. Pooni,et al.  Comparison of the structure of human intervertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine , 2006, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[11]  S. Gibson,et al.  Allograft Versus Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Randomized Control Trial , 2002, Spine.

[12]  V Rasche,et al.  Radial turbo spin echo imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  T. Smit.  The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[14]  J. Bolton,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Study Correlating Lumbar Spine Degeneration With Disability and Pain , 2000, Spine.

[15]  J. Saal.  Clinical Efficacy and Outcome in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain , 1992 .

[16]  Naira Campbell-Kyureghyan,et al.  The prediction of lumbar spine geometry: method development and validation. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  Alberto G. Murta,et al.  Morphological variation of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Iberian and North African Atlantic: implications for stock identification , 2000 .

[18]  A. A. Landman.  Data reduction, and cluster and discriminant analysis of aluminosilicate infrared spectra—fly ash reacted at 860 °C with sodium carbonate as a model system , 2005 .

[19]  F. Smith,et al.  Measurement of the bony anatomy of the humerus using magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  Qi-Bin Bao,et al.  New technologies in spine: nucleus replacement. , 2002, Spine.

[21]  D W Hukins,et al.  Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Hilkka Riihimäki,et al.  Disc Height and Signal Intensity of the Nucleus Pulposus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Indicators of Lumbar Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[23]  W. Glenn,et al.  Dimensions of the lumbar intervertebral foramina as determined from the sagittal plane magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 normal subjects. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[24]  J. Warner,et al.  Serratus Anterior Dysfunction: Recognition and Treatment , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  D. S. Hickey,et al.  Relation Between the Structure of the Annulus Fibrosus and the Function and Failure of the Intervertebral Disc , 1980, Spine.